· Public charity
National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc
The national minority supplier development council advances business opportunities for certified minority business enterprises and connects them to corporate members.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $95,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $172,629 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $77,629 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA MSDC | $15,000 |
| SOUTHWEST MSDC | $15,000 |
| OHIO MSDC | $15,000 |
| MID-STATES MSDC | $15,000 |
| NEW YORK - NEW JERSEY MSDC | $15,000 |
| GEORGIA MSDC | $10,000 |
| PUERTO RICO MSDC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 57% of National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 4% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC3× · 2021–2023 · $64k · revenue +9%
- MMMICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC2× · 2021–2022 · $54k · revenue +13%
- OMOhio Minority Supplier Development Council2× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- NMNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $905k · revenue +51% · 55% of their budget
- SCSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INCone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -11%
- JPJG PALLETS AND TRUCKINGone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Mission of Florida State Minority Supplier Development Council (FSMSDC)is to link corporate and government members with Minority Business Enterprises to foster equity in business.
The mission of the Dallas/Fort Worth Minority Supplier Development Council is to encourage and facilitate procurement and business opportunities between Buying-Entities corporations and public sector agencies and certified Minority…
To prepare and position deserving minority and female owned businesses to win contracts, increase branding visibility, and to expand their client base through relationship development opportunities.
The national minority supplier development council advances business opportunities for certified minority business enterprises and connects them to corporate members.
To provide education and resources to minority operated businesses
Ncmsdc's mission is to provide business development services to corporate members and certified mbes to enhance relationships and maximize business opportunities.
Capital region minority supplier development councils (the council) mission is to provide a direct link between corporate america and minority-owned businesses for the purpose of increasing procurement opportunities.
Identify and develop educational and business opportunities for minority business enterprises (mbes), corporations, and public agencies that result in stakeholder revenue growth.
Emsdc certifies and connects businesses throughout the eastern region of nmsdc (pennsylvania, new jersey and delaware) with domestic and global business opportunities in conjunction with our member corporations. we are committed to…
The mission of HMSDC is to actively involve its members in efforts that will increase and expand business opportunities and business growth for Minority Business Enterprises and to drive excellence in supplier diversity and supplier…
The organization was formed to assist local Black Chambers of Commerce nationally with small business development and growth and to represent the business interest of African American businesses throughout the US.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-States Minority Supplier Development Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Minority Supplier Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MID-STATES MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC ↗
- Who funds Ohio Minority Supplier Development Council ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CAROLINAS VIRGINIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS INC ↗
- Who funds Southwest Minority Supplier Development Council ↗
- Who funds PR MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Local Initiatives Support Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.