How much did NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM grant in FY2024?

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM reported 4 grants totaling $7,958,409 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM based?

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM is based in MN.

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM

We save lives through cellular therapy.

$8.0M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$7.6M

Largest

01What you fund

01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$32MHealth$126kCommunity Improvement$79kHuman Services$50kEducation$9kArts & Culture$8kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$25k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

transplantcoordinators

2020

—

2021

storagecord blood

2022

—

2023

cord

2024

health carecord

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $17k
$10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$250k+1 grant · $7.6M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$403M

Total assets

Largest grants

NMDP FOUNDATION$7,586,216
CORD BLOOD ASSOCIATION$25,000
HOSA INC$9,000
SICKLE CELL CONSORTIUM$8,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$32M · 7 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$32M

$114k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

+8%

Still filing today

86%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NF
NMDP FOUNDATION (FORMERLY BE THE MATCH FOUNDATION)
7× · 2018–2024 · $32M · revenue +108% · 47% of their budget
CB
CORD BLOOD ASSOCIATION
4× · 2018–2021 · $79k · revenue +61%
TF
TRANSPLANT FINANCIAL COORDINATORS ASSOC
2× · 2018–2019 · $14k · revenue +11%

Funded once

CF
CURA FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -88%
AA
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLOOD BANKS
one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +8%
OE
OPTUMHEALTH EDUCATION
one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American Society of Transplant Surgeons

To advance the art and science of transplant surgery.

Health

American Society of Transplantation

Advancing the field of transplantation and improving patient care.

—

Global Blood Fund

To work with low hdi countries to ensure a safe and sufficient blood supply for all.

Philanthropy

American Society for Transplantation &

Improve blood and marrow transplantation and related cellular therapies.

Health

Sickle Cell Transplant Advocacy and Research Alliance

Improve the bone marrow transplant process for sickle cell disease.

Health

San Diego Blood Bank

Connects diverse communities to save and improve lives through blood and biotherapies.

—

The Bleeding Disorder Foundation

The Bleeding Disorder Foundation of Washington mission: The BDFW serves and educates the bleeding disorder community and advocates for access to care for those with rare diseases.

—

North American Vascular Biology

The purpose of navbo shall be to promote, advance, and disseminate information and knowledge related to the scientific field of vascular biology and its interface with human medicine and pathology. these purposes shall be achieved…

Education

Society for Biomaterials

To promote advances in materials research and development.

Health

Oklahoma Blood Institute

To be the donor to patient lifeline by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health

American Thrombosis and Hemostasis

The american thrombosis and hemostasis network (athn) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of people affected by bleeding and clotting disorders. we're using technology to secure data, advance knowledge, transform…

Health

Hawaii Cord Blood Bank

To support measures aimed at improving patient access to transplant, including the collection and public banking of umbilical cord blood from hawaii's ethnically diverse population.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Parent's Guide to Cord Blood and the most unlike its peers is American Association of Blood Banks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/13

Grantees still filing

8/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$31,554,731Health$125,910Community Improvement$79,000Human Services$50,000Other$25,000Education$9,000Arts & Culture$7,500Recreation & Sports$6,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NMDP FOUNDATION (FORMERLY BE THE MATCH FOUNDATION).

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 411704734 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NMDP FOUNDATION (FORMERLY BE THE MATCH FOUNDATION), cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 47% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Marrow Donor Program?

Find your warmest path to National Marrow Donor Program through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Marrow Donor Program?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Marrow Donor Program?

More from the funding graph