Skip to content

· Private foundation

National Intercollegiate Rodeo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$622kRecreation & Sports$88kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$11,900
CLARENDON COLLEGE$9,450
UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA$7,500
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$5,700
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HILL COLLEGE$4,250
WESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE COLLEGE$3,050
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,750
Individual grant recipient$1,750
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$1,650
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY$1,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COCHISE COLLEGE: $4k → 18%CAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITY - SAN LUIS OBISPO: $2k → 12%FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE: $8k → 13%WEATHERFORD COLLEGE: $7k → 8%WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $12k → 13%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE: $5k → 13%PANOLA COLLEGE: $8k → 14%TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY - LUBBOCK: $4k → 15%HILL COLLEGE: $5k → 16%CLARENDON COLLEGE: $9k → 18%SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 20%EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY: $3k → 18%PANHANDLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 13%SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%WESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE COLLEGE: $3k → 17%NORTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $8k → 31%MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 15%BLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6k → 12%EAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 28%GILLETTE COLLEGE: $4k → 9%CASPER COLLEGE: $5k → 11%JAEK DEVERAUX: $5k → 12%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 13%PANOLA COLLEGE: $6k → 14%HILL COLLEGE: $4k → 16%CLARENDON COLLEGE: $9k → 18%PANHANDLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 13%SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%NORTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA: $8k → 31%MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $4k → 15%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%CLARENDON COLLEGE: $8k → 18%PANHANDLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%CUESTA COLLEGE: $3k → 17%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 17%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 13%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $6k → 13%CLARENDON COLLEGE: $4k → 18%MCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 17%TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%CISCO COLLEGE: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
WI
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$470k · 65 repeat orgs$240k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
140

Total granted

$470k
$211k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+4%

Still filing today

5%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MV
    MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +44%
  • NH
    NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL RODEO ASSOC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +59%
  • CM
    CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • FR
    FEATHER RIVER COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Oklahoma State College

The Foundation provides support to EOSC and scholarships to EOSC students.

Education
2
Northern New Mexico College Foundation

Increase, manage, and distribute resources for the benefit of the students, the college, and the community

Education
3
North Central State College Foundation

The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.

—
4
The Northeastern State University

The Foundation was created exclusively to benefit Northeastern State University.

Education
5
South Dakota State University Foundation

Uniting the dreams of our students, university, and donors to build a better sdsu.

Education
6
Colorado Northwestern Community College Foundation

Provide funding for scholarships and improvement projects for colorado northwestern community college

—
7
Midwestern State University Foundation Inc

To receive contributions by means of donations, gifts, and bequests and to expend such funds for the advancement of the literary, scientific, and other educational endeavors of Midwestern State University, a tax exempt institution of…

Education
8
Wichita State University Foundation

Fundraising for wsu and managing the contributions, investments and distributing support to wsu.

Education
9
Southwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc

To help southwestern oklahoma state university raise the resources needed for the university to advance beyond what is possible with state funds and to assist students with tuition and fees in the form of scholarships for attendance at…

Education
10
Columbia State Community College

Encourages improvement of education at our college and making higher education accessible.

—
11
Central New Mexico Community College Foundation Inc

To ensure that no cnm student is denied an education/vocational training due to lack of finances.

—
12
Northeast State Community College Foundation

The northeast state community college foundation promotes and supports academic and educational scholarship, community service, and other programs offered by the college in an effort to provide the resources necessary for students to have…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College of Southern Idaho Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Black Hills State University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $31,900 · OtherCLARENDON COLLEGE: $31,850 · OtherMCNEESE STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,600 · Other+194 more: $590,850 · Other+194 moreMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $12,050 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $2,200 · EducationErskine College and Theological Seminary: $1,000 · Education
Other$685,200Education$15,250

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $12,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL RODEO ASSOC: $9,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL RODEO ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund IncTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Daniels Fund · Tulsa Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Intercollegiate Rodeo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Intercollegiate Rodeo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to National Intercollegiate Rodeo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to National Intercollegiate Rodeo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 221 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Intercollegiate Rodeo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph