Skip to content
National Institute of Transplantation Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Institute of Transplantation Foundation

The foundation's primary purpose is to advance the science and practice of organ transplantation through education and research programs.

$424k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.0M
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $300,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $424,133 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $124,133 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SHEA RESEARCH GROUP$150,000
CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$150,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%IVIVA MEDICAL INC: $150k → 10%BRIGAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $115k → 9%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100k → 22%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO CAMPUS: $150k → 10%CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY: $77k → 14%NYU LANGONE HEALTH (NYU GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE): $150k → 17%METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $75k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SHEA RESEARCH GROUP: $150k → 14%BOARD OF REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $50k → 10%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 16%UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING: $100k → 22%IVIVA MEDICAL INC: $75k → 10%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $150k → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $111k → 10%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $224k → 17%UNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING: $50k → 22%IVIVA MEDICAL INC: $37k → 10%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $149k → 16%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO CAMPUS: $60k → 10%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $150k → 17%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $150k → 17%MASSACHUSETTES GENERAL HOSPITAL: $75k → 16%GENERAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION (MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL): $37k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
VA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $124k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$124k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH GRANT TO ADVANCE THE SCIENCE AND PRACTICE OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 5 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$710k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+84%

Still filing today

20%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    4× · 2017–2023 · $524k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $321k
  • IM
    IVIVA MEDICAL INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $262k

Funded once

  • NL
    NYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +12%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +19%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO
    one grant, 2020 · $83k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
4
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
The Mount Sinai Hospital

Mount sinai is committed to the advancement of the art and science of medicine through clinical excellence. the central mission consists of high-quality patient care and teaching conducted in an atmosphere of social concern and scholarly…

Health
11
Long Island Community Hospital At Nyu Langone Health

The goals and objectives of the corporation are as follows:(a) to operate and maintain a nonsectarian, general hospital at one or more locations for the furnishing of inpatient, ambulatory, restorative, preventative and emergency medical…

—
12
Weill Cornell Imaging At Newyork-Presbyterian

The organization provides outpatient radiology services at seven sites in manhattan, new york and one site in queens, new york, and has received a certificate of need and a license to operate from the new york state department of health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $524,078 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $320,877 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAIVIVA MEDICAL INC: $262,497 · OtherIVIVA MEDICAL INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $150,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING: $150,000 · OtherUNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARINGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $137,499 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $82,500 · OtherMETHODIST HOSPITAL: $75,209 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $75,000 · Other+1 more: $50,000 · OtherTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $374,041 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA U…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $149,930 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE A…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $77,245 · EducationCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY …NYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $150,000 · HealthNYU LANGONE HEALT…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPIT…MAYO CLINIC: $114,513 · HealthMAYO CLINICNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $50,000 · HealthNEW YORK WEILL CO…
Other$1,827,660Education$701,216Health$464,513

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $374,041 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM: $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $149,930 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $114,513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $77,245 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropi…
National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Institute of Transplantation Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Institute of Transplantation Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Institute of Transplantation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home