Skip to content

California · Public charity

National Institute of Transplantation Foundation

The foundation's primary purpose is to advance the science and practice of organ transplantation through education and research programs.

$424k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$300k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$150,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 4
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$18M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations National Institute of Transplantation Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$300k100%
FY20231$150k0%
FY20224$425k100%
FY20214$200k0%
FY20203$257k67%
FY20193$400k67%
FY20182$338k50%
FY20174$334kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.0M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
VA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$524,0784n/a
Regents of the University of California$320,8772n/a
Iviva Medical Inc$262,4973n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$150,0001n/a
Nyu Langone Health System$150,00011%
United Network for Organ Sharing$150,00020%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$150,00010%
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai$149,93010%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$137,4992n/a
University of California San Francisco$82,5001n/a
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of National Institute of Transplantation Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$524,0784n/a
Regents of the University of California$320,8772n/a
Iviva Medical Inc$262,4973n/a
Regents of the University of Michigan$150,0001n/a
Nyu Langone Health System$150,00011%
United Network for Organ Sharing$150,00020%
Children's Hospital Medical Center$150,00010%
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai$149,93010%
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$137,4992n/a
University of California San Francisco$82,5001n/a
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science$77,24510%
Methodist Hospital$75,2091n/a
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$75,0001n/a
University of Wisconsin Madison$50,0001n/a
New York Weill Cornell Medical Center Fund Inc$50,00010%

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Institute of Transplantation Foundation with peer funders

About National Institute of Transplantation Foundation

How much does National Institute of Transplantation Foundation give?
National Institute of Transplantation Foundation reported 2 itemized grants totaling $300,000, out of $424,133 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 4 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does National Institute of Transplantation Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (100%).
Who are National Institute of Transplantation Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Mass General Brigham Incorporated ($524k), Regents of the University of California ($321k), Iviva Medical Inc ($262k).
Does National Institute of Transplantation Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Institute of Transplantation Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is National Institute of Transplantation Foundation based?
National Institute of Transplantation Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Institute of Transplantation’s filings →

More from the funding graph