Skip to content

Iowa · Public charity

National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc

The national speech and debate association connects, supports, and inspires a diverse community committed to empowering students toward higher education through competitive speech and debate.

$300k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$5k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$5,260
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,260
Organizations funded a year
1 to 9
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$5.4M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$5k100%
FY20231$5k100%
FY20225$28k100%
FY20211$180k100%
FY20198$49k50%
FY20189$76kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$208kEducation$123kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$6k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
OR
SD
IN
CA
KY
WV
AZ
NM
KS
AR
OK
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Kentucky$180,0001n/a
Three Rivers School District$22,1452n/a
Usd #305$18,0262n/a
Harrisburg School District 41-2$15,7752n/a
Graystone Elementary School$13,2162n/a
Hutchinson Public Schools$7,9751n/a
McPherson High School$6,9041n/a
Sioux Falls School District #49-5$6,8501n/a
Chs Speech & Debate Boosters$6,64019%
Ashland High School$6,4841n/a
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Kentucky$180,0001n/a
Three Rivers School District$22,1452n/a
Usd #305$18,0262n/a
Harrisburg School District 41-2$15,7752n/a
Graystone Elementary School$13,2162n/a
Hutchinson Public Schools$7,9751n/a
McPherson High School$6,9041n/a
Sioux Falls School District #49-5$6,8501n/a
Chs Speech & Debate Boosters$6,64019%
Ashland High School$6,4841n/a
Little Rock School District$6,0041n/a
Plymouth High School$5,7751n/a
Clear Creek Independent School District$5,5501n/a
Arizona Speech and Debate Coaches Association$5,5301n/a
San Lorenzo Valley Hs Speech and Debate$5,3801n/a
Wood County Schools$5,3261n/a
Usd 469-Lansing$5,2361n/a
Northwest High School Booster Club$5,1801n/a
Nampa School District$5,1201n/a
Navajo Preparatory School Inc$5,00010%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($5k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST)NH15.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc with peer funders

About National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc

How much does National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc give?
National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $5,260, out of $300,071 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Public Benefit (61%), Education (36%), Youth Development (2%).
Who are National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: University of Kentucky ($180k), Three Rivers School District ($22k), Usd #305 ($18k).
Does National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST), GenYOUTH Incorporated, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc based?
National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc is based in IA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Forensic League D/B/A National Speech and Debate Assoc’s filings →

More from the funding graph