· Public charity
National Digital Inclusion Alliance
NATIONAL DIGITAL INCLUSION ALLIANCE advances digital equity by supporting community programs and equipping policymakers to act, so that everyone has the opportunity to use technology to live, learn, work, and thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOOPA VALLEY PUBLIC UTLITIES | $173,426 |
| FOREST COUNTY BROADBAND COMMITTEE | $123,074 |
| EASTER SEALS GREATER HOUSTON | $121,788 |
| CHEROKEE NATION | $121,533 |
| HOCKING ATHENS PERRY COMMUNITY | $121,518 |
| COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM OF WEST | $121,336 |
| NATIONAL DIGITAL EQUITY CENTER | $119,978 |
| PUEBLO OF JEMEZ | $119,450 |
| CAYUSE NATIVE SOLUTIONS | $119,066 |
| COMMUNITY BROADBAND ACTION NETWORK | $119,064 |
| SHAPING OUR APPLACHIAN REGION INC | $116,640 |
| NORTHWESTERN OHIO COMMUNITY ACTION | $116,314 |
| LUMMI INDIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL | $114,894 |
| WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY | $111,540 |
| GILA RIVER TELECOMMUNICATIONS | $110,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $975k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESEASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC3× · 2023–2025 · $366k · revenue +15%
- SOSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $351k · revenue +136%
- AFALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES3× · 2023–2025 · $306k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $123k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $120k
- WSWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $113k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Transforming thinking to improve the environment and quality of life for people with disabilities
The mission of east tennessee technology access center is to connect people with disabilities in east tennessee to the adaptive technology tools and services they need to live with maximum independence and dignity.
To reduce the conditions of poverty by providing comprehensive services to improve lives.to accomplish the mission, hhwp cac will collect and analyze data on the nature of poverty and the existing resources in the area. hhwp cac will…
To achieve its mission, digitunity commits its time, expertise, energy, and influence to 1. cultivate a ready androbust supply of free or low cost computers to support digital inclusion; 2. establish or bolster local systems…
National digital inclusion alliance advances digital equity by supporting community programs and equipping policymakers to act, so that everyone has the opportunity to use technology to live, learn, work, and thrive.
Our mission is to transform lives through teaching digital literacy and equity. The ability to use digital tools to find, analyze, create and communicate information is a critical skill for the survival and quality of life of people…
Access now defends and extends the digital rights of people and communities at risk.
The alamo area community network (aacn) is an alliance of community based organizations (cbo's) working to improve the health and well-being of individuals and families in the san antonio region. the aacn brings together human service and…
Knowbility, Inc. is a national nonprofit whose mission is to create an inclusive digital world for people with disabilities. We help make the internet and other technologies accessible to people who are blind, visually impaired, have…
To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.
The organization is a community based economic development entity serving the 32 counties of appalachia ohio. its mission is to build the capacity of appalachian communities to network, work together and innovate to create a dynamic…
Connect humanity works to expand digital access in rural, low and moderate-income, and historically underserved communities. the organization combines programmatic and financial tools - including grants, technical assistance, coalition…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hockingathensperry Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Shaping Our Appalachian Region Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EASTER SEALS OF GREATER HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BROADBAND ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DIGITAL EQUITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWESTERN OHIO COMMUNITY ACTION COMMI ↗
- Who funds ALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES ↗
- Who funds Computer Reach ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Digital Inclusion Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.