Skip to content
National Capital Affordable Housing Inc at a glance

· Public charity

National Capital Affordable Housing Inc

Promoting and developing affordable housing, including but not limited to special needs housing for persons with mental and other disabilities to become re-integrated into the community.

$809k
Granted FY2019
5
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$317k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of National Capital Affordable Housing Inc’s FY2019 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Sarasota Co Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

3
’17
1
’18
3
’19

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$634kHousing & Shelter$200kCrime & Legal$100kHealth$30kHuman Services$25k
02FY2019 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+2 grants · $634k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA$317,136
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF DC$317,135
JUBILEE HOUSING$100,000
FRIENDS OF GUEST HOUSE$50,000
HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
2
Pathways to Housing Dc

Pathways to housing dc prevents and ends homelessness for persons living with serious psychiatric disabilities and other complex health challenges.

Human Services
3
Project Community Connections Inc

Project community connections, inc. offers housing solutions that disrupt cycles of homelessness and secure quality, affordable homes for our community to live and thrive.

Human Services
4
Iccf Community Homes

Equitable opportunity. affordable homes. thriving neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Housing Initiatives Inc

The mission of community housing initiatives, inc. is to leverage and maximize opportunities for vibrant and resilient communities.

Housing & Shelter
7
Housing Unlimited Inc

Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.

Housing & Shelter
8
Gulf Coast Housing Partnership Inc

It is the mission of gulf coast housing partnership (gchp) to revitalize the gulf coast through transformative development. working in partnership with public, nonprofit, and private entities, gchp will create vibrant, high-quality…

Human Services
9
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
10
Thrive Dc

Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Housing Partnership

Community housing partnership is the leading nonprofit in san francisco helping people who are homeless secure housing and become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
12
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $317,136 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INCGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $317,135 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $100,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE…PLAN OF MDDC INC: $30,000 · HealthPLAN OF MDDC I…JUBILEE HOUSING INC: $100,000 · OtherJUBILEE HOU…COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTRANSITIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $25,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$634,271Health$130,000Other$100,000Community Improvement$50,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SARASOTA CO INC: $317,136 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $317,135 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetJUBILEE HOUSING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSITIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPLAN OF MDDC INC: $30,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charita…
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Capital Affordable Housing Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Capital Affordable Housing Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to National Capital Affordable Housing Inc?

    Find your warmest path to National Capital Affordable Housing Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Capital Affordable Housing’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home