· Public charity
National Athletic Trainers' Association Research and Education Foundation Inc
To champion research, support education and enhance knowledge to optimize the clinical experience and outcomes within the diverse patient populations served by the athletic training profession.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | $49,256 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO | $20,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ATA T Still University of Health Sciences2× · 2017–2019 · $63k · revenue +58%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO2× · 2021–2024 · $48k
- MSMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY2× · 2018–2022 · $46k
Funded once
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBOROone grant, 2017 · $58k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTone grant, 2018 · $57k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEone grant, 2019 · $57k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · American Cancer Society Inc · Columbus Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization National Athletic Trainers' Association Research and Education Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Athletic Trainers' Association Research and Education Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on National Athletic Trainers' Association Research and Education’s filings →