Skip to content
National Archery Association of the US at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

National Archery Association of the US

The association is the national governing body for the sport of archery in the united states.

$753k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$890kEducation$6k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $133,900, the rows itemized in this filing. The $752,769 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $618,869 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
$10,260
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA$35,900
TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$16,905
USA ARCHERY ARIZONA$13,075
FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA$11,540
SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN$10,260
NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$9,645
ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC$9,575
STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA$9,435
NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$9,360
ILLINOIS TARGET ARCHERY ASSOC INC$8,205
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $9k → 11%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $9k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $36k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $10k → 24%ILLINOIS TARGET ARCHERY ASSOC INC: $9k → 7%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $9k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $11k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $35k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $13k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 24%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $8k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $11k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $32k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $11k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $13k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $28k → 12%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $14k → 10%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $9k → 10%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $12k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $27k → 12%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $12k → 10%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $9k → 10%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $11k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $23k → 12%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $10k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $20k → 12%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $19k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$890k · 12 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$890k
$6k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $219k
  • TS
    TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $113k
  • UA
    USA ARCHERY ARIZONA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +95% · 53% of their budget

Funded once

  • BO
    BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (MERCED)
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $219,255 · OtherNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATESTEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $112,915 · OtherTEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATIONFITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $78,600 · OtherFITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIASOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN INC: $72,175 · OtherSOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN INCSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $62,235 · OtherSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INCNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES: $59,530 · OtherNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATESNEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOC: $53,930 · OtherNEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $52,205 · OtherARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INCFLORIDA ARCHERY ASSOCIATION INC: $30,985 · Other+2 more: $22,481 · OtherUSA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $78,890 · Recreation & SportsUSA ARCHERY ARIZ…New York State Archery Association: $52,480 · Recreation & SportsNew York State A…
Other$764,311Recreation & Sports$131,370

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $78,890 over 8y, 53% of budgetSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $62,235 over 8y, 46% of budgetNew York State Archery Association: $52,480 over 6y, 57% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USA ARCHERY ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds New York State Archery Association ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Archery Association of the US funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Archery Association of the US. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Archery Association of the US’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home