Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Archery Association of the US

The association is the national governing body for the sport of archery in the united states.

$753k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$890kEducation$6k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $133,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $752,769 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $618,869 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
$10,260
Median grant
10
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA$35,900
TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$16,905
USA ARCHERY ARIZONA$13,075
FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA$11,540
SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN$10,260
NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$9,645
ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC$9,575
STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA$9,435
NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION$9,360
ILLINOIS TARGET ARCHERY ASSOC INC$8,205
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $9k → 11%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $9k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $12k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $36k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $10k → 24%ILLINOIS TARGET ARCHERY ASSOC INC: $9k → 7%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $9k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $11k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $35k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $17k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $13k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 24%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%STATE ARCHERY ASSOC OF MA: $8k → 8%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $11k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $32k → 12%NEW YORK STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 13%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 10%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $11k → 16%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $10k → 10%ARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC: $9k → 9%NEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $9k → 8%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $13k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $28k → 12%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $14k → 10%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $9k → 10%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $12k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $27k → 12%TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION: $12k → 10%SOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN: $9k → 10%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $11k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $23k → 12%USA ARCHERY ARIZONA: $10k → 11%FITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA: $9k → 6%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $20k → 12%STATE ARCHERS OF CALIFORNIA: $19k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
AZ
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$890k · 12 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$890k
$6k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $219k
  • TS
    TEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $113k
  • UA
    USA ARCHERY ARIZONA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +95% · 53% of their budget

Funded once

  • BO
    BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (MERCED)
    one grant, 2017 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES — $219,255 · OtherNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATESTEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION — $112,915 · OtherTEXAS STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATIONFITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIA — $78,600 · OtherFITA ARCHERS OF PENNSYLVANIASOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN INC — $72,175 · OtherSOCIETY FOR ARCHERY IN MICHIGAN INCSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $62,235 · OtherSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INCNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES — $59,530 · OtherNATIONAL ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATESNEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOC — $53,930 · OtherNEW JERSEY ARCHERY ASSOCARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INC — $52,205 · OtherARCHERY AFFILIATES OF THE USA INCFLORIDA ARCHERY ASSOCIATION INC — $30,985 · Other+2 more — $22,481 · OtherUSA ARCHERY ARIZONA — $78,890 · Recreation & SportsUSA ARCHERY ARIZ…New York State Archery Association — $52,480 · Recreation & SportsNew York State A…
Other$764,311Recreation & Sports$131,370

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUSA ARCHERY ARIZONA — $78,890 over 8y, 53% of budgetSTATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $62,235 over 8y, 46% of budgetNew York State Archery Association — $52,480 over 6y, 57% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USA ARCHERY ARIZONA
  • Who funds STATE ARCHERY ASSOCIATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds New York State Archery Association

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Archery Association of the US funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph