Skip to content
Naths Education Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Naths Education Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$40kInternational$29kCivil Rights$4kYouth Development$4kHealth$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$905Other$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS$4,000
PARNERS IN HEALTH$4,000
EMPOWHER INSTITUTE$2,782
THE STANFORD FUND$1,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS$500
MANHATTAN BEACH POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION$300
UNICEF USA$150
LOS ANGELES MISSION$100
ACT BLUE$25
Individual grant recipient$25
ACT BLUE$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $405 → 14%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $1k → 8%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
MS
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 11 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
40

Total granted

$50k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+21%

Still filing today

64%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS
    4× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +34%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +91%
  • EI
    EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +464%

Funded once

  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -83%
  • AC
    ACTBLUE CHARITY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • UF
    USC-VITERBI FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
6
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
7
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
8
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
9
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
10
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALEM-KEIZER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,700 · OtherSALEM-KEIZER EDUCATION FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPARNERS IN HEALTH: $4,000 · OtherPARNERS IN HEALTHACTBLUE CHARITY: $3,988 · OtherACTBLUE CHARITYUSC-VITERBI FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH: $2,000 · Other+32 more: $16,416 · Other+32 moreINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $10,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELI…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRON…International Rescue Committee INC: $1,700 · InternationalInternational Resc…+3 more: $1,001 · International+3 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationTHE BOARD…EMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC: $3,282 · EducationEMPOWHER …UCLA FOUNDATION: $500 · EducationUCLA FOUN…Sewa International Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,172 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $405 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $321 · HealthLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $300 · Housing & ShelterLONG BEACH RESCUE MISSION: $200 · Housing & ShelterNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Arts & CultureSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $11 · Crime & Legal
Other$57,104International$15,701Education$8,282Human Services$7,077Health$6,321Housing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$100Crime & Legal$11

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSALEM-KEIZER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,700 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWHER INSTITUTE INC: $3,282 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,172 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $405 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $321 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManhattan Beach Police Officers Association: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES MISSION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $251 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH RESCUE MISSION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $11 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naths Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naths Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Naths Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home