Skip to content

· Private foundation

Natalie W & Leo E Wolf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$127kHealth$86kArts & Culture$43kReligion$37kEnvironment$25kFood & Nutrition$8kRecreation & Sports$7kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$303
Median grant
7
States reached
$587k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON$8,300
LEAGUE OF NH CRAFTSMAN$7,575
THE NEW LONDON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC$3,402
TEMPLE BETH JACOB$2,804
TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM$2,065
COLBY-SAWYER COLLEGE$2,000
PROCTOR ACADEMY$1,500
PROUTY PROJECT$1,400
2 LIFE COMMUNITIES$1,180
LAKE SUNAPEE VNA & HOSPICE$1,150
MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE$1,000
MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER$1,000
LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION$900
THE CURRIER MUSEUM OF ART$500
AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $25 → 7%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER: $2k → 8%MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 8%MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 8%MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER: $1k → 8%MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER: $50 → 8%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$336k · 73 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
42

Total granted

$336k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+25%

Still filing today

45%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $965 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +17%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $26k · revenue +162%
  • LS
    LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH FUNDS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • TC
    THE CUMMER MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • DH
    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
11
New Hampshire Historical Society

To educate a diverse public about the significance of New Hampshire's past and its relationship to our lives today. To this end, the Society collects, preserves, and interprets material pertaining to New Hampshire history.

Arts & Culture
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lenny Zakim Fund; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
43/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAGUE OF NH CRAFTSMAN: $23,825 · OtherLEAGUE OF NH CRAFTSMANMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $15,200 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTEMPLE BETH ELOHIM: $14,817 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELOHIMDANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTETHE JIMMY FUND: $13,424 · OtherDANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTETHE JIMMY FUNDTemple Beth Jacob: $13,204 · OtherTemple Beth JacobUNITED CHURCH FUNDS INC: $7,750 · OtherTHE FELLS (HAY ESTATE NEWBURY NH): $7,660 · OtherMASS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $7,330 · OtherLEAGUE OF NHCCRAFTSMEN: $6,415 · OtherLAKE SUNAPEE VNA & HOSPICE: $6,000 · Other+70 more: $39,508 · Other+70 moreTHE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC: $110,547 · EducationTHE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INCPROCTOR ACADEMY: $4,000 · Education+6 more: $3,350 · EducationDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $26,168 · HealthDana-Farber C…The New London Hospital Association Inc: $9,002 · HealthThe New Londo…Children's Hospital Corporation: $3,600 · HealthChildren's Ho…+8 more: $1,833 · HealthLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $16,000 · EnvironmentAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $8,250 · Environment+4 more: $1,025 · EnvironmentMEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $5,150 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 · Human Services+3 more: $91 · Human ServicesMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $2,010 · Arts & CultureNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $750 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educational Foundation: $510 · Arts & CultureBOSTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 · Arts & CultureCommunity Gallery Inc: $400 · Arts & CultureNEW ENGLAND SKI MUSEUM INC: $350 · Arts & CultureOPERA NORTH: $250 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $190 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $365 · Arts & Culture2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $3,030 · Housing & ShelterHospitality Homes Inc: $125 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $25 · Housing & Shelter
Other$155,133Education$117,897Health$40,603Environment$25,275Human Services$5,441Arts & Culture$5,325Housing & Shelter$3,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC: $110,547 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $26,168 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION: $16,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetThe New London Hospital Association Inc: $9,002 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST: $8,250 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $5,150 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $3,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budget2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $3,030 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE: $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $2,010 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LENNY ZAKIM FUND: $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $510 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $503 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT STUDENT DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND SKI MUSEUM INC: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERA NORTH: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSQUARE ONE COMMUNITY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWTON POLICE MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $190 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LONGBOAT KEY EDUCATION CENTER INC: $180 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKINGHAM BROWNE & NICHOLS SCHOOL: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospitality Homes Inc: $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BRAIN TUMOR SOCIETY INC: $102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWABAN IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVATIONS FOR THE CURE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFULLER CRAFT MUSEUM INC: $80 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL OF WESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAKE SUNAPEE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The New London Hospital Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUSBON SARGENT LAND PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MEETING HOUSE CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LENNY ZAKIM FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS ↗
  • Who funds JOHN HAY ESTATE AT THE FELLS ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA32.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Ibm International Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Dulude Family Foundation Inc · Barrette Family Fund · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Schimberg Family Charitable Foundation · The Burkehaven Family Foundation · Hjd Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Natalie W & Leo E Wolf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Natalie W & Leo E Wolf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Center for the Arts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Fuller Craft Museum Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Buckingham Browne & Nichols School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Natalie W & Leo E Wolf’s filings →

More from the funding graph