· Public charity
Nasi Project Inc
To provide religious outreach in the jewish community.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANI MAAMIN FOUNDATION | $51,500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS BOSTON | $36,000 |
| YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM | $10,676 |
| BNOS ESTHER MALKA | $9,000 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF WOODLAKE VILLAGE | $7,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- PAPROJECT ANI MAAMIN FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2022 · $76k · revenue -65% · 39% of their budget
- COCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD3× · 2017–2020 · $17k · revenue +60%
- LLAHAV2× · 2017–2018 · $14k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $8k
- CACAMP AGUDAHone grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students
Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education
Operation of an educational institution for preschool and elementary school-aged children, providing both religous and secular education.
Providing jewish education to high school age students.
Providing jewish and secular education for high school girls.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Nasi Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nasi Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
- Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nasi Project Inc?
Find your warmest path to Nasi Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Nasi Project’s filings →