Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Napa Valley Performing Arts Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$969k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$964k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$1.2MEducation$54k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $250k+1 grant · $964k
$3,673
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS$964,459
NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS$3,673
NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS$526
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE WHITE BARN: $3k → 9%THE WHITE BARN: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -42% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$1.2M
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-42%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $996k · revenue +932% · 75% of their budget
  • MI
    Music in the Vineyards Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $48k · revenue +58%
  • NV
    Napa Valley Youth Symphony
    2× · 2019–2020 · $19k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • LP
    LUCKY PENNY PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue +8%
  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LINCOLN THEATER DBA LINCOLN THEATER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Bernardino Valley Concert Association
2
Napa Valley Music Associates

Napa Valley Music Associates was founded in 1990 and incorporated as a California non-profit 501(c)(3) tax exempt corporation in 1991. Since then, we have enriched the Napa community and the greater San Francisco Bay Area with unique…

Unclassified
3
Symphony of the Vines

The presentation of symphonic and chamber music

Arts & Culture
4
The California Theatre of Santa Rosa

To champion the performing arts in Santa Rosa for all. To connect people with one another and with art that can enrich their lives. To embrace people from all backgrounds. To provide exceptional service to our resident companies and to…

Arts & Culture
5
Berkeley Chamber Performances

Providing an annual series of chamber music concerts for audiences in Berkeley and Lafayette, California, for the past 33 years.

Arts & Culture
6
Noe Valley Chamber Music

Noe Valley Chamber Music (d.b.a. Noe Music) is a non-profit organization founded in 1992. Based in an intimate neighborhood setting in the heart of San Francisco, Noe Music combines world-class live performances with interactive education…

Arts & Culture
7
Del Valle Fine Arts Productions Inc

Present classical music concerts to advance the arts.

8
Palo Alto Philharmonic Association

The Palo Alto Philharmonic Association (PAPA) exists to promote and enhance appreciation of orchestral and chamber music for audiences of all ages, and to provide musicians in the Bay Area with the opportunity to perform and develop their…

9
Philharmonia Northwest

Philharmonia Northwest contributes to the vitality of the classical music community in the Pacific Northwest by presenting professional concerts highlighting the diverse past and present repertoire for chamber orchestra. It is also…

Arts & Culture
10
New Vintage Baroque Inc Dba Musica Sierra

New Vintage Baroque Inc's purpose is to enrich the cultural experience of the Lost Sierra with world-class, year-round performances and music education, accessible and affordable for all.

Arts & Culture
11
Music in Place

Music in Place connects people and communities through music while curating high-quality experiences and supporting artists who create them.

Arts & Culture
12
San Lorenzo Valley Mountain Community Theater
Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Napa Valley Youth Symphony and the most unlike its peers is Lucky Penny Productions Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS — $995,658 · Arts & CultureNAPA VALLEY PRESENTSMusic in the Vineyards Inc — $47,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $30,832 · Arts & CultureNAPA REGIONAL DANCE FOUNDATION — $47,500 · OtherNAPA REGIONAL DAN…ST HELENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $32,766 · OtherST HELENA UNIFIED…ST HELENA HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $21,134 · OtherST HELENA HIGH SC…NAPA VALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY — $20,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY JAZZ …LUCKY PENNY PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED — $18,000 · OtherLUCKY PENNY PRODU…ST HELENA CHORAL SOCIETY — $12,830 · OtherST HELENA CHORAL …NAPA VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER — $12,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY PERFO…THE ST HELENA COMMUNITY BAND — $12,000 · OtherTHE ST HELENA COM…STHELENA CHORALE SOCIETY — $9,090 · OtherNAPA VALLEY MUSIC ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · Other+2 more — $4,435 · OtherTHE WHITE BARN — $5,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$1,073,990Other$196,755Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNAPA VALLEY PRESENTS — $995,658 over 2y, 75% of budgetMusic in the Vineyards Inc — $47,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetNAPA VALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY — $20,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetNapa Valley Youth Symphony — $18,747 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetLUCKY PENNY PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED — $18,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF LINCOLN THEATER DBA LINCOLN THEATER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WHITE BARN — $5,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetASE GLOBAL BRIDGES INC — $2,085 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY PRESENTS
  • Who funds Music in the Vineyards Inc
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY JAZZ SOCIETY
  • Who funds Napa Valley Youth Symphony
  • Who funds LUCKY PENNY PRODUCTIONS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LINCOLN THEATER DBA LINCOLN THEATER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE WHITE BARN
  • Who funds ASE GLOBAL BRIDGES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Napa ValleyCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Napa Valley Performing Arts Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Napa Valley Performing Arts Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Napa Valley Performing Arts Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph