Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Naiop Massachusetts Inc

Naiop's mission is to educate and inform members about trends, best management practices, and other issues concerning the real estate industry through newsletter publications, conferences, conventions and seminars.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Housing & Shelter$545kPhilanthropy$91kCommunity Improvement$45kEducation$45kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$10kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $35,182 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $45,060 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,878 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUILDERS OF COLOR COALITION$20,000
THRIVE SCHOLARS$10,000
HEADING HOME$5,182
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 8%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $5k → 8%MARGARET FULLER HOUSE: $10k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$681k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

$681k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HEADING HOME INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $535k · revenue +282%
  • TS
    THRIVE SCHOLARS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +55%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • MF
    MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +71%
  • THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +282%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Impact Initiative Fund

Form 990 - organization's mission or most significant activitiesboston impact initiative (bii) is a nonprofit impact investment fund and certified community development financial institution (cdfi). bii provides small businesses,…

Community Improvement
2
New England Community Project Inc

Necp believes that social change happens when those most impacted by issues of systemic injustice, organize at the block level to address issues within their neighborhoods. through their involvement at a community level, residents engage…

Community Improvement
3
Boston Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
5
Neighborworks Soma Realty Inc

Facilitating the advancement of low and moderate income persons and other underserved residents in the south shore area of massachusetts and to assist such persons in finding and acquiring suitable housing by providing real estate…

Housing & Shelter
6
Familyaid Boston Inc

Familyaid boston empowers parents and caregivers facing homelessness to secure and sustain housing and build strong foundations for their children's futures.

7
Citizens Inn Inc

The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)

Housing & Shelter
8
Boston Foundation Inc

As Greater Boston's community foundation, the Boston Foundation devotes its resources to expanding opportunities, improving lives and strengthening communities. See Schedule OThe Foundation fulfills this mission in three principal ways:…

Philanthropy
9
Greater Boston Legal Services Inc

Greater boston legal services (gbls) is the primary provider of free civil (non-criminal) legal assistance to the almost 341,000 low-income persons living in metropolitan boston to help them secure some of the most basic necessities of…

10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
We Are Alx Inc

We are alx is a statewide nonprofit organization dedicated to strengthening economic mobility, leadership representation, and long-term prosperity across massachusetts by advancing latino entrepreneurship, workforce participation, civic…

Community Improvement
12
Urban Impact Initiative Massachusetts

Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Commonwealth Kitchen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Basis Impact Group Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HEADING HOME INC — $534,546 · Housing & ShelterHEADING HOME INC+1 more — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBUILDERS OF COLOR COALITION — $35,000 · Community ImprovementBUILDERS O…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $30,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY I…COMMONWEALTH KITCHEN INC — $5,206 · Community ImprovementCOMMONWEAL…United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $61,001 · PhilanthropyUnited Wa…THRIVE SCHOLARS — $40,000 · EducationSAM ELIMU CHARITY — $5,001 · EducationBASIS IMPACT GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $10,188 · Human ServicesMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $10,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalKAGE GROWTH STRATEGIES LLC — $5,000 · Other
Housing & Shelter$544,546Community Improvement$70,206Philanthropy$61,001Education$50,001Human Services$25,188Crime & Legal$10,000Other$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEADING HOME INC — $534,546 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc — $61,001 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE SCHOLARS — $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDERS OF COLOR COALITION — $35,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $10,188 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE FOR A NEW COMMONWEALTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH KITCHEN INC — $5,206 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAM ELIMU CHARITY — $5,001 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBASIS IMPACT GROUP FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Naiop Massachusetts Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc23% of income from government
  • Heading Home Inc17% of income from government
  • Commonwealth Kitchen Inc9% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph