Skip to content

· Private foundation

Naftzger Fund for Fine Arts Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.2MArts & Culture$230kAnimals$25kEnvironment$20kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$830Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNTION$100,000
TANGANYIKA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$25,000
THE ORPHEUM THEATRE$25,000
WICHITA ART MUSEUM$25,000
7 STUDENT AWARD RECIPIENTS$13,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NEWMAN UNIIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WICHITA MARK ARTS$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $830) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RAINBOWS UNITED INC: $830 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
IN
OH
PA
MO
MD
KS
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 17 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

$1.4M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+14%

Still filing today

53%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Friends University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $56k · revenue +43%
  • NU
    NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +7%
  • WC
    WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $45k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • FU
    FRIENDS UNIVERSITY PLANNED GIVING
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
4
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
8
Rockford University

To educate men & women to lead responsible lives by means of a curriculum grounded in liberal arts learning and complemented and extended by professional and practical experience, through the total academic and co-curricular experience,…

Education
9
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
10
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
11
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
12
Dakota Wesleyan University

Dakota wesleyan university aspires to be a leading university that educates students to identify and develop their individual talents for successful lives in service to god and the common good.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Newman University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY: $400,000 · OtherWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARYWICHITA MARK ARTS: $68,500 · OtherWICHITA MARK ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $57,394 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWSU FOUNDATION: $48,850 · OtherWSU FOUNDATIONINDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC: $40,001 · OtherChamber Music At The Barn Inc: $35,000 · Other+26 more: $119,500 · Other+26 moreWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · EducationWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCFriends University: $56,280 · EducationFriends UniversityNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $55,000 · EducationNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INCWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $45,000 · EducationWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOLWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $7,500 · EducationWichita Art Museum Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTANGANYIKA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsBOTANICA INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $830 · Human Services
Other$769,245Education$693,780Arts & Culture$50,000Animals$25,000Environment$20,000Human Services$830

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetFriends University: $56,280 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC: $55,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC: $40,001 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChamber Music At The Barn Inc: $35,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetWICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC THEATRE WICHITA: $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBOTANICA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOWS UNITED INC: $830 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends University ↗
  • Who funds NEWMAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Chamber Music At The Barn Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC THEATRE WICHITA ↗
  • Who funds TANGANYIKA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOWS UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lattner Family Foundation IncFL22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Ima Foundation · DeVore Foundation Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Annie Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Berry Foundation Inc · Wichita Foundation · Bonavia Family Charitable Trust · Koch Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naftzger Fund for Fine Arts Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naftzger Fund for Fine Arts Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Naftzger Fund for Fine Arts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph