· Public charity
NACDC Financial Services Inc
Provide alternative financing opportunity for Native American entrepreneurs and small businesses in communities in and near Indian Reservations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $1,454,781 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,545,973 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,192 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Four Bands Community Loan Fund | $203,664 |
| Montana Native Growth Fund | $183,226 |
| Akiptan Inc | $170,493 |
| Wind River Development Fund | $149,659 |
| Indigenous Impact Co | $144,000 |
| Plenty Doors Community Development Corporation | $117,694 |
| Native American Development Corporation | $114,763 |
| Black Hills Community Loan Fund | $103,899 |
| Montana Health Care Foundation | $100,000 |
| Peoples Partner for Community Development Corporation | $66,283 |
| Sweet Grass Consulting LLC | $51,100 |
| Mountain Plains CDC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $345k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBLACK HILLS COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC3× · 2022–2024 · $323k · revenue +105%
- TPTHE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT3× · 2022–2024 · $267k · revenue +262%
- NANATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON3× · 2022–2024 · $257k · revenue +168%
Funded once
- ACARROW CREEK WELLNESS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage, stimulate and promote economic development, expansion and diversification in southeastern montana
Native Community Development Financial Institution. To foster, facilitate and promote community and economic development among Dry Creek Tribal members, thier families and other Native
Economic development for the west central mountain idaho region
Great northern development corporation (gndc) is a montana nonprofit corporation. its purpose is to support and promote commerce in northeastern montana. the board of gndc solicits public and private contributions to allocate among various…
The organization seeks to foster economic and financial independence for native people by assisting in the development of personal assets through financial and entrepreneurial education as well as providing access to capital through…
The organization's purpose is to improve the economic, social and cultural status of montana's urban native americans by promoting and creating job opportunities and providing education assistance
Foster Business Development in Cozad, NE
To provide through local leadership economic, technical, and engineering information, and access to resources to improve theeconomies in the area.
Economic Development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Development Corporaton and the most unlike its peers is Montana Healthcare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACK HILLS COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON ↗
- Who funds AKIPTAN INC ↗
- Who funds FOUR BANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Island Mountain Community Development Financial Institution Inc ↗
- Who funds PLENTY DOORS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WIND RIVER DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds MONTANA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAINS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Northwest Area Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Oweesta Corporation · Native American Agriculture Fund · Ndn Collective Inc · Opportunity Finance Network · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Nations Development Institute
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization NACDC Financial Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.