Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Myrta J Pulliam Charitable Trust co Holly Pantzer

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$359k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.9MArts & Culture$1.3MAnimals$1.2MHealth$360kPublic Benefit$255kEnvironment$227kRecreation & Sports$103kCommunity Improvement$79kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREE PRESS INDIANA$250,000
Newfields$50,000
Depauw University$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Eiteljorg Museum$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Indianapolis Zoo$4,000
Metropolitan Museum of Art$2,500
Herron High School$2,000
Hoosier environmental council$2,000
WFYI$2,000
Central Indiana Land Trust Incorporated$2,000
Park Tudor School$1,000
Women's Fund of Central Indiana$1,000
Indianapolis Cultural Trail$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Exodus Refugee Immigration Inc: $5k → 16%Exodus Refugee Immigration Inc: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CT
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 50 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against -48% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
13

Total granted

$5.3M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-48%

Still filing today

68%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $256k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DePauw University
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +43%
  • IZ
    Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +85%
  • CI
    CENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED
    7× · 2019–2025 · $109k · revenue +349%

Funded once

  • Teach for America Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -3%
  • DF
    DRESS FOR SUCCESS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

4
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
5
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

6
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.

Community Improvement
7
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana Association of Realtors Inc

To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…

12
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr23%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr23%85%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
32/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DePauw University — $1,450,000 · EducationDePauw UniversityQueens University of Charlotte — $305,000 · EducationQueens University of CharlotteARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · Education+6 more — $70,500 · EducationNewfields Inc — $1,200,000 · Arts & CultureNewfields IncFREE PRESS INDIANA — $250,000 · Arts & CultureFREE PRESS INDIANA+8 more — $67,800 · Arts & CultureIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $1,209,000 · AnimalsIndianapolis Zoological…ESKENAZI HEALTH — $255,000 · OtherESKENAZI HEALTHIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual gran…THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $104,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONS…INDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC — $78,000 · OtherINDIANAPOLIS CU…Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc — $32,000 · Other+33 more — $208,050 · Other+33 moreCENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $109,000 · EnvironmentHoosier Environmental Council Inc — $9,000 · Environment+2 more — $5,000 · EnvironmentNorthwestern University — $100,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $3,000 · Recreation & SportsEskenazi Health Foundation Inc — $85,000 · Health+4 more — $5,200 · Health
Education$1,900,500Arts & Culture$1,517,800Animals$1,209,000Other$782,050Environment$123,000Recreation & Sports$103,000Health$90,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDePauw University — $1,450,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $1,209,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetNewfields Inc — $1,200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte — $305,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $109,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $104,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc — $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC — $78,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHERRON HIGH SCHOOL INC — $37,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Indiana Community Foundation Inc — $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $12,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHoosier Environmental Council Inc — $9,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Oaks Academy Inc — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEARD MUSEUM — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetExodus Refugee Immigration Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIDO INC — $4,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTEL HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHarrison Center for the Arts Inc — $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK TUDOR FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana Repertory Theatre Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENNEDY KING MEMORIAL INITIATIVE — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRandom Acts of Flowers — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
  • Who funds Newfields Inc
  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte
  • Who funds FREE PRESS INDIANA
  • Who funds CENTRAL INDIANA LAND TRUST INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc
  • Who funds INDIANAPOLIS CULTURAL TRAIL INC
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC
  • Who funds HERRON HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE INDIANA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds Hoosier Environmental Council Inc
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC
  • Who funds The Oaks Academy Inc
  • Who funds THE HEARD MUSEUM
  • Who funds Exodus Refugee Immigration Inc
  • Who funds Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN51× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Griffith Family Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Myrta J Pulliam Charitable Trust co Holly Pantzer funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Indian River Land Trust Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph