Skip to content

· Public charity

Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc

To lead and mobilize resources toward effective management, treatment and ultimately a cure for myotonic dystrophy through education, advocacy and research.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$2.0MEducation$1.1MHealth$885k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $847,600, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,008,046 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $160,446 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $805k
$105,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$190,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA$145,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$105,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$105,000
UNVERSITY OF ALBANY$105,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$50,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL$50,000
VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERS$42,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($3.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($455k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSP: $105k → 16%STANFORD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $190k → 8%SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $105k → 11%UNIVERISTY OF ROCHESTER: $245k → 14%UNVERSITY AT ALBANY: $295k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $105k → 16%SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $53k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $105k → 19%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $55k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $190k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $55k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $105k → 19%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERS: $190k → 22%THE JACKSON LABORATORY: $199k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CA SAN DIEGO: $55k → 11%UNIVERISTY OF ROCHESTER: $160k → 14%UNVERSITY OF ALBANY: $105k → 14%HOUSTON METHODIST NEURO INST: $102k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $55k → 19%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERS: $7k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $63k → 14%UNVERSITY AT ALBANY: $55k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $55k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $53k → 19%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERS: $55k → 22%VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERS: $43k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
CA
UT
MO
VA
NC
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($455k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$210k · 2 grants
Italy$190k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$55k · 1 grant

Grants abroad, by region: $158k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$155k · 98% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

North America (Canada and Mexico)$3k · 2% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 9 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$2.3M
$916k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+51%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $505k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    3× · 2019–2023 · $468k · revenue +54%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2020–2021 · $160k · revenue +47%
  • TS
    THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $158k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JACKSON LABORATORYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $199k · revenue +51%
  • SU
    SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME
    one grant, 2022 · $190k
  • UD
    UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL
    one grant, 2022 · $105k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
4
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University; the most unlike its peers is The Scripps Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT PURCHASE: $350,000 · OtherSTATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK COLLEGE AT PURCHASEVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $295,000 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $222,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDABOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION: $195,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATIONUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $190,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHSAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME: $190,000 · OtherSAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROMEMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $155,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL: $105,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $105,000 · OtherGRIMN: $105,000 · OtherTMH PHYSICIAN ORGANIZATION: $102,000 · Other+4 more: $210,000 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $467,840 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $298,494 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION I…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $190,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND ST…Baylor College of Medicine: $160,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $105,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State …WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $55,000 · EducationEmory University: $55,000 · EducationTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $199,270 · HealthTHE JACKSO…THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $157,500 · HealthTHE SCRIPP…
Other$2,224,500Education$1,331,334Health$356,770

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $467,840 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $298,494 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $199,270 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $190,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $160,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $157,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $105,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTMH PHYSICIAN ORGANIZATION: $102,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds TMH PHYSICIAN ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myotonic Dystrophy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph