Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

My Brother's Keeper Alliance

My Brother's Keeper Alliance ("MBK Alliance") is an independent, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) that works to elevate the voices of boys and young men of color and unite cross-sector leaders and youth to improve life outcomes and impact lasting social change.

$1.1M
Granted FY2017
13
Grants FY2017
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $761k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$75,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP$250,000
NY PUBLIC LIBRARY$211,768
ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$102,000
LONG BEACH CARES$100,000
ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
UNITY COUNCIL$100,000
PEOPLE FIRST PARTNERSHIP$75,000
BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE$72,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION$27,500
NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY ACADEMY FOUNDATION$20,000
PROJECT 500$20,000
DETROIT PARENT NETWORK$12,500
BOSTON EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT FUND$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $13k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
NM
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
2
Brooklyn Community Foundation

Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.

Philanthropy
3
Community Education Commission

CEC works with diverse stakeholders across Detroit to develop critical resources and system-level solutions that address common challenges faced by Detroit families in accessing quality education.

Education
4
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
5
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Kern County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
Los Angeles Business Council Formerly Known As West La Chamber of Commerce

The los angeles business council, labc, serves the los angeles community by providing public education, awareness to community issues, advocacy of sustainable development, workforce housing and business development.

7
The City of Los Angeles Workforce Development Board

The Workforce Development Board promotes workforce development activitieswhich connect Los Angeles jobseekers and youth to training, workforce preparedness and employment opportunities. Facilitates placing youth into private,public &…

8
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Sioux Empire

To nurture, educate and enrich children and youth for life-long success.

Human Services
9
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

10
Boys & Girls Clubs of the North Valley

To inspire and enable all young people to reach their full potential as caring, productive, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
11
Bellevue Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, and especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens. we provide prevention-focused programming for youth, ages 2-19, within our core…

12
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albuquerque Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Detroit Parent Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP — $250,000 · EducationCHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIPThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $211,768 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Til…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $202,000 · PhilanthropyALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDA…LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC — $72,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUS…LONG BEACH CARES — $100,000 · OtherLONG BEACH CARE…NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY ACADEMY — $20,000 · OtherNATIVE AMERICAN…PROJECT 500 — $20,000 · OtherPROJECT 500THE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherTHE BOSTON EDUC…SEEDING SUCCESS — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentSEEDING SU…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION — $27,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND G…SPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementSPANISH SP…Detroit Parent Network — $12,500 · Human Services
Education$461,768Philanthropy$274,000Other$150,000Youth Development$102,500Community Improvement$100,000Human Services$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHICAGO COOK WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $211,768 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $202,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSEEDING SUCCESS — $75,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN CHEYENNE NATION — $27,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization My Brother's Keeper Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2018) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph