Skip to content

· Private foundation

Murry and Florence Schott Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$111kInternational$42kPhilanthropy$26kHealth$18kCrime & Legal$17kHuman Services$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kCivil Rights$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNANCA$12,000
SHELTER BOX$3,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$3,000
DC FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION$3,000
PHOENIX BIKES$2,500
HELP MATE$2,000
MUTUAL AID DISASTER RELIEF$2,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL$2,000
APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY$2,000
MSF - DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
CASA$1,000
RAINBOW CHILDREN'S HOME$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
CREATING FRIENDSHIPS FOR PEACE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP MATE: $2k → 12%HELP MATE: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CA
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$251k · 16 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$251k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +38%
  • RI
    REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +8%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRIDAYS FOR FUTURE USA
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY DE PUERTO RICO
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MD
    MSF - DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Refugee Protection International Inc

Rpi's mission is to partner with local non-gov organizations and others to strengthen protection and self-reliance among refugees and internally displaced persons near conflict zones.

International
2
International Refugee Assistance Project Inc

Irap is a global legal aid and advocacy organization working to create a world where refugees and all people seeking safety are empowered to claim their right to freedom of movement and a path to lasting refuge. everyone should have a safe…

Human Services
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
5
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
International Rescue Committee Inc

The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.

International
8
Independent Diplomat Inc

To offer independent and confidential advice and practical assistance in diplomatic strategy and technique to governments, political groups, international organizations and ngos on diplomatic process and decision-making.

International
9
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
10
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
11
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
12
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helpmate Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNANCA: $111,000 · OtherUNANCATHE ROTARY FOUNDATION: $22,504 · OtherTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION+8 more: $24,504 · Other+8 moreTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $27,267 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER…REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,500 · InternationalREFUGEES INTERNAT…+1 more: $500 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,500 · HealthDC FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $9,000 · Crime & LegalRAINBOW CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 · Crime & LegalEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $11,000 · Civil RightsSHELTERBOX USA INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesHELPMATE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesMUTUAL AID DISASTER RELIEF INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPHOENIX BIKES: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$158,008International$40,267Health$15,000Crime & Legal$13,000Civil Rights$11,000Human Services$10,500Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Recreation & Sports$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $27,267 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUTUAL AID DISASTER RELIEF INC: $10,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDC FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPHOENIX BIKES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHELPMATE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATING FRIENDSHIPS FOR PEACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MUTUAL AID DISASTER RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DC FIREFIGHTERS BURN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX BIKES ↗
  • Who funds HELPMATE INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL VETERANS LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATING FRIENDSHIPS FOR PEACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Murry and Florence Schott Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Murry and Florence Schott Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Murry and Florence Schott Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Murry and Florence Schott Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murry and Florence Schott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph