Skip to content

· Public charity

Munson Healthcare Foundations

Inspiring charitable support to enhance health care for the people of northern michigan.

$8.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$61MRecreation & Sports$19kEmployment$9k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $692k
  • $250k+10 grants · $7.6M
$351,304
Median grant
1
States reached
$82M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER$2,552,009
MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER$1,159,316
PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$714,839
MUNSON HOME CARE$650,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC$570,000
MUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL H$513,000
PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$492,427
MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC$378,888
MUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPIT$351,304
MUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL H$257,708
MUNSON HEALTHCARE$234,559
MUNSON HEALTHCARE MANISTEE HOSPITAL$153,625
MUNSON HEALTHCARE GRAYLING$138,760
MUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPIT$82,781
MUNSON HEALTHCARE GRAYLING$82,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DISABILITY NETWORK NORTHERN MI: $19k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 13 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$61M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+60%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35M · revenue +39%
  • MH
    MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +128%
  • PO
    PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • DN
    DISABILITY NETWORK NORTHERN MICHIGANgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue +40%
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $9k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Munson Healthcare Manistee Hospital Foundation

The mission of the munson healthcare manistee hospital foundation is to raise, manage,and grant funds to support munson healthcare manistee hospital's mission to provide accessible, quality, compassionate healthcare services to improve the…

—
2
Munson Healthcare Cadillac Hospital Foundation

None.

—
3
Munson Healthcare Charlevoix Hospital Foundation

The mission of the munson healthcare charlevoix hospital foundation is to raise, manage,and grant funds to support munson healthcare charlevoix hospital's mission to provide accessible, quality, compassionate healthcare services to improve…

—
4
Munson Healthcare Otsego Memorial Hospital Foundation

The mission of the munson healthcare otsego memorial hospital foundation is to provide a comprehensive program of fund development that supports the mission and vision of munson healthcare otsego memorial hospital.

—
5
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
6
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
7
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
8
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
9
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
10
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
11
Mount Nittany Health System

To provide management and administrative services to all mount nittany health susidiaries.

Health
12
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Munson Healthcare Manistee Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Disability Network Northern Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $34,543,146 · HealthMUNSON MEDICAL CENTERMUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC: $7,968,589 · HealthMUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLACPAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $4,054,331 · HealthPAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITALMUNSON HOME CARE: $3,835,110 · HealthMUNSON HOME CAREMUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPITAL: $2,833,653 · HealthMUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,173,636 · HealthMUNSON HEALTHCARE MANISTEE HOSPITAL: $2,060,381 · Health+3 more: $1,590,584 · HealthMUNSON HEALTHCARE: $1,414,611 · OtherWEXFORD PHO: $370,712 · OtherHEALTH DEPARTMENT OF NORTHWEST MICHIGAN: $103,100 · Other+1 more: $19,750 · OtherDISABILITY NETWORK NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $18,542 · Human ServicesGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $9,000 · Employment
Health$59,059,430Other$1,908,173Human Services$18,542Employment$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNSON MEDICAL CENTER: $34,543,146 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC: $7,968,589 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $4,054,331 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetMUNSON HOME CARE: $3,835,110 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPITAL: $2,833,653 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,173,636 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE MANISTEE HOSPITAL: $2,060,381 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE GRAYLING: $1,480,225 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMUNSON HEALTHCARE: $1,414,611 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMUNSON MEDICAL GROUP: $67,109 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $43,250 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetMUNSON DIALYSIS CENTER: $19,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $18,542 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUNSON MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE CADILLAC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL OLIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HOME CARE ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE CHARLEVOIX HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE OTSEGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE MANISTEE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE GRAYLING ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON MEDICAL GROUP ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds MUNSON DIALYSIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY NETWORK NORTHERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Center for Rural HealthMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Center for Rural Health · Michigan Health & Hospital Association Dba Mha · West Michigan Regional Medical Consortium · Rotary Charities of Traverse City · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Munson Healthcare Foundations funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Munson Healthcare Foundations. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Munson Healthcare Foundations’ filings →

    More from the funding graph