Skip to content
Mukti Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Mukti Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$316kEducation$105kPhilanthropy$42kYouth Development$37kCivil Rights$28kPublic Benefit$13kHuman Services$6kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCF FOUNDATION$10,000
UCF FOUNDATION$10,000
ORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE$9,500
ORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE$9,000
EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE$8,000
YOUTH ACTION FUND$5,000
HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 13%Hope Community Center: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$417k · 9 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$417k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE THEATER OFFENSIVE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $312k · revenue +148%
  • OY
    ORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +14%
  • HC
    HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • OT
    ON THE MOVE - LGBTQ CONNECTION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • VC
    VALENCIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • SS
    SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equality Florida Action Inc

Equality florida action is the advocacy arm of the largest civil rights organization working to secure full equality for florida's lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (lgbtq) community.(continued on schedule o)we work to pass…

Civil Rights
2
Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights
3
Our Fund Foundation Inc

Our fund's mission is to promote a culture of philanthropy by uniting donors with organizations supporting the lgbt community. our fund foundation exists to support a sustainably livable community by working with individuals, families,…

Philanthropy
4
Funders for Lesbian and Gay Issues Inc Dba Funders for Lgbtq Issues

Funders for lgbtq issues work to increase the scale and impact of philanthropic resources aimed at enhancing the well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer communities, promoting equity, and advancing racial, economic and…

Civil Rights
5
Out & Equal

To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.

Social Science
6
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
7
University of Florida Alumni Association Inc

The mission of the university of florida alumni association, inc. ("association") is to exclusively support and enhance the mission of the university of florida ("university") of pursuing "excellence in education and research and shaping a…

Education
8
National Lgbtq Task Force Action Fund Inc

National lgbtq task force action fund, founded in 1974 as the national gay and lesbian task force, inc., works to build the grassroots political power of the lgbt community to win complete equality. we do this through direct and grassroots…

—
9
Lgbt Center Orlando Inc

Lgbt+ center orlando, inc provides a safe space, counseling, youth and senior programming. they also offer a food panty and a meeting space for social, support and recovery groups.

—
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Florida Inc

To promote civil liberties through communication and interaction with and between the citizens and legislators of the state of florida

Civil Rights
11
Equality Federation Institute

Equality federation institute is an advocacy accelerator rooted in social justice, building power in our network of state-based lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (lgbtq+) advocacy organizations.

Civil Rights
12
Equality Federation

Equality federation is an advocacy accelerator rooted in social justice, building power in our network of state-based lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (lgbtq+) advocacy organizations.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Reserve Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
5/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE THEATER OFFENSIVE INC: $311,500 · Arts & CultureTHE THEATER OFFENSIVE INC+2 more: $4,500 · Arts & CultureSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $40,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INCORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $30,500 · EducationORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE …ALBION COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationALBION COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL F…UCF: $15,000 · OtherUCFON THE MOVE - LGBTQ CONNECTION: $15,000 · OtherON THE MOVE - L…CITY OF WINTER PARK: $13,000 · OtherCITY OF WINTER …UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF C…SPARTANBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,500 · OtherSPARTANBURG COM…VALENCIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherVALENCIA COLLEG…SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA: $5,000 · OtherSEMINOLE STATE …Individual grant recipient: $2,812 · Other+5 more: $5,950 · Other+5 moreEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC: $24,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA YOUTH ACTION FUND INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsONE ORLANDO ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsHOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesTHE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropySOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $2,000 · InternationalZEBRA YOUTH INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Arts & Culture$316,000Education$115,500Other$77,262Civil Rights$30,000Human Services$5,500Philanthropy$2,000International$2,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE THEATER OFFENSIVE INC: $311,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORLANDO YOUTH ALLIANCE INC: $30,500 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVALENCIA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA YOUTH ACTION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEY WEST FILM SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GLENDA G MORGAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH AFRICA PARTNERS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE: $1,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE ORLANDO ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetZEBRA YOUTH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Proteus Fund IncCentral Florida Found…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Proteus Fund IncMA15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Proteus Fund Inc · Central Florida Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mukti Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mukti Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • South Africa Partners Inc: 42% of income from government
  • The Theater Offensive Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Hope Community Center Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Key West Film Society Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mukti’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home