Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mukhtyar Family Scholarship & Chari

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$141kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$5kHuman Services$5kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$546Public Benefit$58Animals$50Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$51
Median grant
4
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAIN CENTER OF NEW YORK$1,500
Individual grant recipient$138
Individual grant recipient$52
ABONDONED CHILDREN FUND$51
SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES$36
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$20
IVWF$15
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 30% of grant dollars ($51k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 70% that went abroad ($117k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $15 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
NJ
CA
MO
VA
DC
OK
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 70% of all-years giving ($117k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$117k · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 9 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
23

Total granted

$112k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
0%

Still filing today

11%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MANAV MANDIR MISSION
    3× · 2017–2021 · $88k
  • JC
    JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $11k
  • SC
    SHARE CARE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $5k

Funded once

  • RN
    RATNA NIDHI CHARITABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • SA
    SHRI AKHIL BHARTIYA HINSA NIVARAN S
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • SM
    SURAT MANAV SEVA SANGH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
2
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Feeding America's Children

Collection and distribution of food and medical supplies to those in need in Arizona, the United States and other desperate famine stricken third world countries.

Human Services
5
Food for Orphans Inc

Contributions to various organization providing assistance to orphans throughout the world.

International
6
End Hunger Network

The End Hunger Network is a nonprofit organization working with the entertainment community, celebrities, influencers, and social media content creators to encourage, stimulate and support media projects, programs and events aimed at…

Human Services
7
Deliver Rescuing Children At Risk

Finding forever homes for children

Human Services
8
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
9
Hunger Free America Inc

Hunger free america (hfa) is a nonpartisan, national nonprofit organization building the movement to enact the policies and programs needed to end domestic hunger and ensure that all americans have sufficient access to nutritious food.

—
10
Food in Need of Distribution Inc

Food in need of distribution, inc. (find food bank) is dedicated to relieving hunger, the causes of hunger, and the problems associated with hunger through awareness, education, and mobilization of resources and community involvement.

Food & Nutrition
11
Relieve Humanity International Inc

Relieve poverty

International
12
Missionaryatheart

MISSIONARYATHEART provides charitable assistance to impoverished children and adults of the Dominican Republic. Our efforts include medical programs, feeding programs, and educational programs all while showing others the love of Jesus…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed the Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Arch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MANAV MANDIR MISSION: $88,001 · OtherMANAV MANDIR MISSIONJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC: $11,228 · OtherJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INCRATNA NIDHI CHARITABLE TRUST: $7,050 · OtherSHRI AKHIL BHARTIYA HINSA NIVARAN S: $6,000 · Other+26 more: $54,752 · Other+26 moreFRIENDS OF ARCH INC: $401 · InternationalABANDONED CHILDRENS FUND: $80 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $20 · InternationalFeeding America: $25 · Food & NutritionChristian Herald Association Inc: $25 · ReligionCOVENANT HOUSE: $15 · Human Services
Other$167,031International$501Food & Nutrition$25Religion$25Human Services$15

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF ARCH INC: $401 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetABANDONED CHILDRENS FUND: $80 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $58 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ABANDONED CHILDRENS FUND ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mukhtyar Family Scholarship & Chari funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mukhtyar Family Scholarship & Chari. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mukhtyar Family Scholarship & Chari’s filings →

More from the funding graph