Skip to content
Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation

International and community service, health, hunger, and humanity programs.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Youth Development$70kInternational$61kHuman Services$60kHealth$59kPublic Benefit$49kEducation$44kArts & Culture$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $38,850, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,850 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$542k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL$14,850
CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON$9,000
BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA$7,500
TURNING POINT$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOAN ROSE FOUNDATION: $8k → 8%TURNING POINT: $16k → 10%TURNING POINT: $10k → 10%TURNING POINT: $9k → 10%TURNING POINT: $8k → 10%MARTHA T BERRY MEDICAL FACILITY: $8k → 10%TURNING POINT: $8k → 10%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES: $7k → 10%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES: $3k → 10%TURNING POINT: $1k → 10%COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA: $11k → 10%BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA: $10k → 10%MACOMB FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 10%BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA: $8k → 10%BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA: $3k → 10%BRAVO PROGRAMS OF AMERICA: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$274k · 11 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$274k
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+37%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCrime & LegalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $52k · revenue +95%
  • BP
    Bravo Programs of America Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +116% · 26% of their budget
  • RI
    ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CM
    CLINTON MACOMB PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $19k
  • TF
    THE FELLOWSHIP AT CINCO RANCH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • BO
    baker of clinton township
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
2
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
3
Michigan Psychiatric Society

Mission is to represent the interests and professional needs of psychiatric physicians in michigan while striving to ensure quality care for people with mental disorders and their families through promotion of education, research and…

—
4
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
5
Community Pride Mi
Public Benefit
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
7
Matrix Human Services

Inspired by its heritage since 1906, matrix human services advocates for and services the most vulnerable in the metropolitan detroit community and empowers individiuals and families to enhance the quality of their lives and achieve self…

—
8
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
9
Macomb Residential Opportunities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life

—
10
Traverse Bay Childrens Advocacy Center

The traverse bay children's advocacy is built upon a model of success used by children's advocacy centers nationwide, and customized through collaborative team input in our region. our mission speaks to protecting children by providing…

—
11
Macomb County Rotating Emergency Shelter Team

To provide homeless and displaced individuals the opportunity for successful transition to independence.

Housing & Shelter
12
Rotary Club of Traverse City Michigan

To provide humanitarian service, encourage high ethical standards in all vocations, and help build goodwill and peace in the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care of Southeastern Michigan; the most unlike its peers is Joan Rose Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCLAREN FOUNDATION: $44,000 · OtherMCLAREN FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $41,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF MOUNT CLEMENS: $39,538 · OtherCITY OF MOUNT CLEMENSROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $29,580 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALCLINTON MACOMB PUBLIC LIBRARY: $19,000 · OtherCLINTON MACOMB PUBLIC LIBRARYROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $14,158 · OtherROTARY INTERNATIONALCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON: $9,000 · OtherTHE FELLOWSHIP AT CINCO RANCH INC: $8,413 · Otherbaker of clinton township: $8,000 · Other+6 more: $13,125 · Other+6 moreTURNING POINT INC: $51,960 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT INCBravo Programs of America Inc: $32,000 · Human ServicesBravo Programs of America IncCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INCYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $8,000 · Human ServicesYMCA of Metropolitan DetroitMARTHA T BERRY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA T BERRY FOUNDATIONJOAN ROSE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human ServicesJOAN ROSE FOUNDATION+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · InternationalMACOMB FOOD PROGRAM: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCARE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $7,000 · HealthMACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMACOMB COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$226,314Human Services$121,960International$10,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Health$7,000Arts & Culture$6,000Crime & Legal$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT INC: $51,960 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBravo Programs of America Inc: $32,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $29,580 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Detroit: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACOMB FOOD PROGRAM: $7,500 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetCARE OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWERTZ WARRIORS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMICHIGAN TRANSIT MUSEUM: $625 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way for Southe…Community Foundation …Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mt Clemens Rotary Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mt Clemens Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home