Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ms Worthington Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$215kAnimals$174kEducation$170kScience & Tech$112kEnvironment$41kPhilanthropy$36kRecreation & Sports$30kHealth$28kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k11 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL$15,000
RAPTOR TRUST$5,000
NANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL$5,000
CATTRAP INC$5,000
MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION$5,000
ARTISTS ASSN OF NANTUCKET$5,000
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON$5,000
NANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS$5,000
WOODS HOLE OCEAN INSTITUTE$5,000
RELIEF ASSOCIATION INC IN NANTUCKET$3,000
NANTUCKET CHAMBER MUSIC CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($752k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($109k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEADS WORLD CLASS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 11%YMCA CAMP BELKNAP: $261 → 9%NEADS WORLD CLASS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
TN
LA
TX

Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($109k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Italy$70k · 3 grants
United Kingdom$34k · 3 grants
OC$5k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$773k · 26 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
12

Total granted

$773k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+55%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN
    7× · 2017–2023 · $68k · revenue +187%
  • NL
    NANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $47k · revenue +60%
  • MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $41k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • MW
    MARY WALKER HIS EDU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CHIMP HAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +121%
  • TC
    The Children's Health Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -46%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
2
Nantucket Land & Water Council Inc

Protect nantucket's natural world and rural character by holding and enforcing conservation restrictions, commissioning scientific research, monitoring development proposals, engaging in legal proceedings to protect natural resources, and…

Environment
3
Nantucket Atheneum Inc

The nantucket atheneum, a private non-profit organization provides public library service to the island's year-round and seasonal residents, housed in a historic 1847 building and the weezie library for children. the atheneum collects,…

4
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
5
The Nantucket Education Trust Inc

To generate private support for public education on nantucket, to foster private and public partnerships that benefit the children of nantucket public schools, and to honor excellence in teaching and learning.

6
Nantucket Partnership for Children Inc

Nantucket new school is an independent day school serving students in pre-school through grade eight and strong wings is an outdoor adventure school.

7
New England Museum Association

New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.

8
Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound Inc

The alliance to protect nantucket sound is a 501(c)(3) non-profit environmental organization dedicated to the permanent preservation of nantucket sound, the historic body of water that lies between cape cod, martha's vineyard, and…

Environment
9
Cape Cod Museum of Natural History

To inspire appreciation, understanding and stewardship of our natural environment through discovery and learning.

Arts & Culture
10
'Sconset Trust Inc

To preserve the character of the village of 'sconset by conserving open land, preserving historically and/or architecturally significant structures and fostering a healthy commercial center in keeping with 'sconset's character.

Environment
11
The Maritime Aquarium At Norwalk Inc

The maritime aquarium at norwalk seeks to ignite a connection to long island sound and the ocean to enrich the lives of all people and inspire action to protect our blue planet.

Arts & Culture
12
Nantucket Lightship Basket Museum Inc

Promote the awareness and appreciation of lightship baskets and their makers, by educating and engaging the public about the complexity of this art form unique to nantucket. exhibiting historic and contemporary baskets.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Albert F Egan Jr & Dorothy H Egan F. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Animal Rescue and AdoptionWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Independent K-8 SchoolsChristian Youth CampsClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Arts OrganizationsEarly Childhood Education C…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%38%20–35yr14%29%35–55yr14%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr14%43%35–55yr14%23%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,331

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SACI — $69,500 · OtherSACINANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN — $67,500 · OtherNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION INWOODS HOLE OCEAN INSTITUTE — $44,000 · OtherWOODS HOLE OCEAN INSTITUTETHE FINDHORN FOUNDATION — $34,000 · OtherTHE FINDHORN FOUNDATIONMARY WALKER HIS EDU FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherMARY WALKER HIS EDU FOUNDATIONRELIEF ASSOCIATION INC IN NANTUCKET — $13,000 · OtherNANTUCKET CHAMBER MUSIC CENTER — $12,500 · OtherFOSTER PARROTS LTD — $12,000 · Other+9 more — $35,047 · Other+9 moreNANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL INC — $102,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL INCNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $35,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC …PLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC — $27,256 · Arts & CulturePLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS IN…NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $15,015 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOC…NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RAPTOR TRUST — $40,500 · AnimalsTHE RAPTOR TRUSTNANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS INC — $39,500 · AnimalsNANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR…CATTRAP INC — $39,000 · AnimalsCATTRAP INCCHIMP HAVEN INC — $20,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCWILD BIRD FUND INC — $14,000 · AnimalsWILD BIRD FUND INC+2 more — $9,000 · Animals+2 moreThe Bridge School — $55,000 · EducationThe Bridge Sch…NANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC — $47,000 · EducationNANTUCKET LIGH…World Ocean School Inc — $6,518 · EducationWorld Ocean Sc…+1 more — $500 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $41,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET DISC GOLF INC — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F — $8,000 · HealthNEADS INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesYMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC — $261 · Human Services
Other$307,547Arts & Culture$197,771Animals$162,000Education$109,018Environment$41,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Health$8,000Human Services$5,261

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL INC — $102,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetNANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN — $67,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetThe Bridge School — $55,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC — $47,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST — $40,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS INC — $39,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCATTRAP INC — $39,000 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $35,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNANTUCKET DISC GOLF INC — $30,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetPLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC — $27,256 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $15,015 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILD BIRD FUND INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F — $8,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWorld Ocean School Inc — $6,518 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOUT TO SEE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEADS INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC — $261 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NANTUCKET ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds NANTUCKET MARIA MITCHELL ASSOCIATION IN
  • Who funds The Bridge School
  • Who funds NANTUCKET LIGHTHOUSE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST
  • Who funds NANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS INC
  • Who funds CATTRAP INC
  • Who funds NANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER
  • Who funds NANTUCKET DISC GOLF INC
  • Who funds PLIMOTH PATUXET MUSEUMS INC
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC
  • Who funds NANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WILD BIRD FUND INC
  • Who funds The Children's Health Fund
  • Who funds NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ALBERT F EGAN JR & DOROTHY H EGAN F
  • Who funds World Ocean School Inc
  • Who funds OUT TO SEE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARTISTS ASSOCIATION OF NANTUCKET INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds NEADS INC
  • Who funds LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC
  • Who funds THE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD
  • Who funds YMCA CAMP BELKNAP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nantucket Golf Club Foundation IncMA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Tupancy-Harris Fdn-1986 · The George & Marie Chabot Charitable Foundation · King Spruce Company · Charina Foundation Inc Richard Menschel · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Sse Worthington Foundation · Elizabeth Thayer & E Geoffrey Verney Foundation · The Carl & Nancy Gewirz Fund Inc · Twin Chimney Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ms Worthington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in9% of income from government
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc4% of income from government
  • World Ocean School Inc4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Community Music Center1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc1% of income from government
  • Neads Inc1% of income from government
  • Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association1% of income from government
  • New England Wildlife Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Artists Association of Nantucket Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ms Worthington Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ms Worthington Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph