Skip to content

· Private foundation

Moshe and Chavie Foundation Inc

$71k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Religion$242kPhilanthropy$75kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$500Public Safety & Disaster$360Other$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k11 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$1,575
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$31,375
Congregation Mincha Chadosha$12,000
THE OJC FUND$10,000
CONGREGATION BAIS SHIMON$7,550
CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH$2,500
CONG TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF$1,875
CONGREGATION TIFERES YAKOV$1,575
KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN$1,360
MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO$1,080
BETH JACOB TEACHERS SEMINARY$500
VARIOUS$350
SHAREing CAREing$250
BAIS TZIPORAH INC$250
Congregation Bais Moshe of Koruv$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Congregation Mincha Chadosha: $12k → 14%CONGREGATION KEREN VYOEL MOISHE: $9k → 14%Congregation Avodas Yisroes of Kosn: $825 → 20%Congregation of Forest Park: $1k → 11%GLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER: $8k → 14%Congregation Adas Yereim: $500 → 20%Congregation Mincha Chadosha: $3k → 14%GLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER: $3k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA KODSHIM: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS SHULIM ELIAZER: $32k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $27k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $20k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $17k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $10k → 20%MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO: $9k → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS SHULIM ELIAZER: $6k → 20%BIALA YESHIVA OR KEDOSHIM: $3k → 20%MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO: $3k → 20%KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN: $2k → 20%YESHIVA CHAIM V SHULOM: $2k → 20%EZRAS CHOLIM YAD EPHRAIM: $2k → 20%THE OJC FUND: $2k → 20%CONG TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION TIFERES YAKOV: $2k → 20%KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH: $50k → 20%Talmud Torah Dchasidei Gur: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS SHIMON: $14k → 20%KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN: $1k → 20%CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH: $13k → 20%MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO: $1k → 20%Congregation Bais Moshe of Koruv: $11k → 20%CONGREGATION TIFERES YAKOV: $1k → 20%BAIS HAMEDRASH UMESIVTA NESIVOC HAT: $8k → 20%CONGREGATION TIFERES YAKOV: $600 → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS SHIMON: $8k → 20%KOLLEL AVREICHIM OF BROOKLYN: $500 → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS SHIMON: $8k → 20%BETH JACOB TEACHERS SEMINARY: $500 → 20%CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH: $6k → 20%MOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO: $500 → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS MOSHE OF KORUV IN: $5k → 20%BAIS HAMEDRASH UMESIVTA NESIVOC HAT: $3k → 20%CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH: $3k → 20%CONGREGATION BAIS MORDECHAI: $2k → 20%Nesivos Hatalmud: $31k → 20%MESIVTA NESIVOS HATALMUD: $2k → 20%CONGREGATION OHR SHRAGA DVERETSKY: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$244k · 12 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
19

Total granted

$244k
$34k

Still filing today

0%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationFood & NutritionMembership BenefitPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH
    4× · 2019–2023 · $71k
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BAIS SHULIM ELIAZER
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $32k

Funded once

  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEREN VYOEL MOISHE
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OHR SHRAGA DVERETSKY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BY
    BIALA YESHIVA OR KEDOSHIM
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH: $71,350 · OtherCONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAHCONGREGATION BAIS SHULIM ELIAZER: $38,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS SHULIM ELIAZERIndividual grant recipient: $31,735 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION BAIS SHIMON: $28,800 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS SHIMONCONGREGATION BAIS MOSHE OF KORUV INC: $15,810 · OtherCONGREGATION BAIS MOSHE OF KORUV INCCongregation Mincha Chadosha: $14,500 · OtherMOSDOS CHASIDEI SQUARE TYY OF BORO: $12,990 · OtherBAIS HAMEDRASH UMESIVTA NESIVOC HAT: $11,450 · OtherGLOBAL CENTER OF SKVER: $10,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KEREN VYOEL MOISHE: $9,297 · Other+20 more: $31,950 · Other+20 moreTHE OJC FUND: $75,200 · EducationTHE OJC FUND+2 more: $2,490 · EducationEzras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc: $2,000 · Food & NutritionShmira Community Services Inc: $360 · Public BenefitVAAD HARABONIM OF QUEENS: $180 · Membership Benefit
Other$275,882Education$77,690Food & Nutrition$2,000Public Benefit$360Membership Benefit$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $75,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM: $2,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEzras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetShmira Community Services Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVAAD HARABONIM OF QUEENS: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM ↗
  • Who funds Ezras Cholim Yad Ephraim Inc ↗
  • Who funds Limud Hatorah Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Shmira Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds VAAD HARABONIM OF QUEENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY36.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Hf Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Kollel Zichron Avrohom Inc · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Vyazreim Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moshe and Chavie Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moshe and Chavie Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moshe and Chavie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph