Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mortensen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$557kReligion$124kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEducation$56kCivil Rights$55kRecreation & Sports$30kArts & Culture$10kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,519
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREEHOUSE INC$6,519
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$811k · 6 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$811k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TREEHOUSE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $557k · revenue -46%
  • LT
    LIGHT THE WAY CHURCH
    4× · 2019–2022 · $114k
  • NL
    NEW LIFE ACADEMY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $56k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICA'S CHARITIESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +43%
  • HH
    HUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -23%
  • 4K
    4TH KINGDOM MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Paul Capitals Hockey Association

The st. paul capitals hockey association, a community built around a common respect for the game of hockey, strives to consistently develop players and coaches to their full potential in a fun and safe hockey environment. spcha members…

Recreation & Sports
2
Active Kids Association of Sport

Providing sports programs and sports education for youth and their families. aka sport's mission is to get kids more active through sports and exercise by creating and offering sports programs and healthy opportunities.

Recreation & Sports
3
Usa Cycling Inc

Usa cycling is the national governing body for cycling, making it responsible for the conduct and administration of cycling in the usa. the mission of usa cycling is to develop the sport of cycling in the united states at all levels and to…

Recreation & Sports
4
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
5
United States Anti-Doping Agency

Preserve the integrity of competition, inspire true sport, protect the rights of u.s. athletes

Recreation & Sports
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
National Sporting Goods Association

Nsga supports its members' efforts to grow their business and advocates on their behalf by offering the following: 1) resources for recruiting, training, and development; 2) valuable publications & communications; 3) education and…

8
Usa Team Handball

To develop, promote, educate, and grow the sport of team handball at all levels in the united states and to enable united states athletes to achieve sustained competitive excellence to win medals in international and olympic competition.

Recreation & Sports
9
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

10
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
11
Ice Sports Association Dba Scheels Iceplex

Operate and program an ice arena providing public and private ice rental facilities to the community and region with an emphasis on serving and growing youth ice sports.

Youth Development
12
Athletes Committed to Educating Students

Our sole mission is to engage and empower youth. we strive to ensure that all youth in our programs are thriving, both inside and outside of the classroom. at aces, we know learning and growth can best happen when youth are engaged in…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Sanneh Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Association of the United States Army. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TREEHOUSE INC — $556,519 · HealthTREEHOUSE INCLIGHT THE WAY CHURCH — $114,000 · OtherLIGHT THE WAY CHURCHAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $100,000 · OtherAMERICA'S CHARITIESRAISE THE BARR FOUNDATION — $55,000 · OtherRAISE THE BARR FOUNDATION4TH KINGDOM MINISTRIES — $10,000 · Other+3 more — $10,500 · OtherNEW LIFE ACADEMY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentFREE BIKES 4 KIDZ MN — $2,475 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY — $500 · Public Benefit
Health$556,519Other$289,500Education$56,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Youth Development$3,500Human Services$2,475Public Benefit$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTREEHOUSE INC — $556,519 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW LIFE ACADEMY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $56,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TREEHOUSE INC
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES
  • Who funds NEW LIFE ACADEMY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds HUDSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FREE BIKES 4 KIDZ MN
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mortensen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mortensen Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mortensen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph