Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morrison Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$268kCommunity Improvement$115kArts & Culture$81kHealth$37kEducation$25kPublic Benefit$12kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$577k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST$34,500
CENTRAL MS PREVENTION SERVICES$32,687
GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER$11,000
FRIENDS OF VICKSBURG NATIONAL PARK$5,000
EUDORA WELTY FOUNDATION$5,000
MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK$1,920
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW$1,000
SOUTHERN HERITAGE AIR FOUNDATION$1,000
TRIUMP CHURCH$500
STOREHOUSE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 22%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 22%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 13 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$495k
$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+33%

Still filing today

31%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST
    7× · 2019–2025 · $230k
  • CS
    CRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $63k
  • EW
    Eudora Welty Foundation Inc
    3× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue -44%

Funded once

  • HE
    HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +185%
  • SU
    SHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -77%
  • MC
    MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION FOR INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vicksburg-Warren Humane Society

To provide food, shelter, and vet services for stray, unwanted, and terminally ill animals in the warren county and vicksburg area.

Animals
2
Vicksburg Foundation for Historic Preservation

Identify, preserve, protect, and interpret Vicksburg's historic built environment.

Arts & Culture
3
United Methodist Volunteers in Miss Ion Southeastern Jurisdictioninc

To connect and coordinate united methodist volunteers and their christian friends with persons in need of humanitarian assistance and spiritual encouragement.

Religion
4
Center for Mississippi Healthpolicy
Health
5
East Mississippi Development Corporation Meridian Community College
—
6
United Way of East Mississippiinc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the community by giving, advocating, and volunteering

—
7
Vicksburg and Warren County Industrial Foundation

The mission of the organization focuses on bringing together the business community to support economic development long-term strategic planning, develop funding, and provide expertise in the development of sound local and regional…

Community Improvement
8
Economic Development Center of Washington County Inc

To promote and assist in economic development, job creation and job training for washington county, ms and surrounding areas. to promote and assist existing businesses in the area.

Community Improvement
9
Mississippi County Arkansas Economic Opportunity Commission Inc

Provide support, education and training for Low-Income indivuduals to help become self-sufficient and lead lives of dignity

—
10
Jackson County Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to support commerce and promote growth to enhance the quality of life in jackson county.

Community Improvement
11
West Alabama Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to help alleviate hunger and food insecurity in west alabama.

—
12
Revitalize Mississippi Inc
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Food Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jesus Others & You Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST: $229,500 · OtherCRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODISTCRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $62,500 · OtherCRAWFORD STREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCENTRAL MS PREVENTION SERVICES: $44,687 · OtherCENTRAL MS PREVENTION SERVICESUVA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherUVA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · Other+14 more: $62,775 · Other+14 moreHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $100,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRISE …Eudora Welty Foundation Inc: $55,000 · Arts & CultureEudora Welty …MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION FOR INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI C…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI: $25,000 · HealthGOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $2,920 · Food & NutritionJesus Others & You Inc: $2,500 · Food & NutritionSTOREHOUSE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$461,462Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$81,000Health$25,000Human Services$15,000Philanthropy$6,000Food & Nutrition$5,920

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEudora Welty Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI: $25,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVICKSBURG-WARREN CO CHAMBER OF COM: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $2,920 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJesus Others & You Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTOREHOUSE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Eudora Welty Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHAPE UP MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI COMMISSION FOR INTERNATIONAL CULTURAL EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VICKSBURG-WARREN CO CHAMBER OF COM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Jesus Others & You Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN HERITAGE AIR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STOREHOUSE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for MississippiMS13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Mississippi · International Paper Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morrison Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morrison Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Morrison Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Morrison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morrison’s filings →

    More from the funding graph