Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morris & Anne Ashendorf Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$332kReligion$149kEducation$20kInternational$13kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kArts & Culture$3kHousing & Shelter$600Other$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,315
CHABAD SHUL OF POTOMAC ADEL FUND$4,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENCE FORCE$3,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$2,500
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$2,000
AM FRIEDS MAGEN DAVID ADOM$1,000
BIKUR CHOLIM OF GR WASHINGTON$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CHABAD SHUL OF POTOMAC$1,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN FUND OF GR WASHINGTON$500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GR WASHINGTON$500
AISHEL HOUSE$500
SUNFLOWER BAKERY (LEARNING DISAB)$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 16%SULAM: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 18 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
21

Total granted

$527k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+28%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +68%
  • YN
    YESHIVAT NOAM
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +27%
  • BC
    BIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • YH
    YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +28%
  • AJ
    AMERICAN JEWISH JT DISTRIB COM
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
8
Yeshiva of Phoenix

To create an educationally advanced orthodox elementary school to prepare students to be strong, committed, observant jews.

Philanthropy
9
University of Judaism Foundation
—
10
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
11
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
12
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva High School for Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Family Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE FUND: $325,500 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FUNDHADASSAH: $100,000 · OtherHADASSAHIndividual grant recipient: $33,910 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD SHUL OF POTOMAC ADEL FUND: $19,000 · Other+30 more: $54,766 · Other+30 moreYESHIVAT NOAM: $8,000 · EducationYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $6,000 · EducationThe Frisch School: $2,000 · EducationHIAS INC: $5,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $2,000 · Human ServicesSulam Inc: $500 · Human ServicesBIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementJEWISH BOOK TRUST INC: $1,800 · ReligionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 · Health
Other$533,176Education$16,000International$8,000Arts & Culture$3,000Human Services$2,500Community Improvement$2,000Religion$1,800Health$360

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frisch School: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BOOK TRUST INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSulam Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TORAH ACADEMY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frisch School ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BOOK TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Sulam Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Kahan Family Foundation · Brian and Dafna Berman Family Foundation Inc · M D Katz Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Fjc · The Ojc Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morris & Anne Ashendorf Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morris & Anne Ashendorf Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Yeshiva High School for Girls Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
  • Torah Academy of Bergen County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morris & Anne Ashendorf’s filings →

More from the funding graph