Skip to content

· Private foundation

Morrill Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$362k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$322k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$322kEnvironment$139kAnimals$48kInternational$46kEducation$23kHealth$8kPublic Benefit$8kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $250k+1 grant · $322k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND$321,510
THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD$10,000
CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY$10,000
OXFAM AMERICA INC$5,000
THE LAND INSTITUTE$5,000
REACH OUT AND READ INC$5,000
NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ICIVICS INC: $3k → 8%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $5k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $10k → 12%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 10%FAIRBANKS MUSEUM AND PLANETARIUM: $5k → 12%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%REACH OUT AND READ: $3k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 12%READING IS FUNDAMENTAL: $3k → 14%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 10%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $3k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 12%READING IS FUNDAMENTAL: $3k → 14%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%REACH OUT AND READ INC: $3k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 12%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 12%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%OXFAM AMERICA: $5k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $8k → 12%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $5k → 13%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%OXFAM AMERICA: $5k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $4k → 13%NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $5k → 5%OXFAM AMERICA INC: $5k → 16%CORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%THE LAND INSTITUTE: $4k → 13%OXFAM AMERICA INC: $5k → 16%OXFAM AMERICA: $5k → 16%OXFAM AMERICA: $5k → 16%FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $322k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WI
NY
MA
NJ
NM
KS
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 10 repeat orgs$334k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +113% since the first grant, against +72% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$262k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+72%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $322k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +226%
  • TL
    The Land Institute
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +141%
  • NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k · revenue +262%

Funded once

  • FM
    FAIRBANKS MUSEUM & PLANETARIUMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +69%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +72%
  • TN
    THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +105%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
5
Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics Inc

To protect national forests and to reform the u.s. forest service by advocating for environmental ethics, educating citizens, and defending whistleblowers.

Unclassified
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
8
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
9
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment
10
International Food Policy Research Institute

International food policy research institute's (ifpri) vision is a world free of hunger and malnutrition. ifpri's mission is to provide research-based policy solutions that sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Land Institute; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $321,510 · OtherFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUNDCORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · OtherCORNELL LABORATORY OF ORNITHOLOGYCORNELL UNIVERSITYThe Land Institute: $38,000 · OtherThe Land Institute+1 more: $5,000 · OtherTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $62,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FOREST …OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $35,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 · InternationalNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $38,000 · EnvironmentREACH OUT AND READ INC: $17,000 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $6,000 · EducationICIVICS INC: $5,000 · EducationTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $2,500 · EducationFAIRBANKS MUSEUM & PLANETARIUM: $5,000 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $2,500 · HealthTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Animals
Other$409,510Youth Development$62,500International$45,500Environment$38,000Education$30,500Arts & Culture$5,000Health$2,500Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD: $62,500 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetThe Land Institute: $38,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC: $38,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $35,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICIVICS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRBANKS MUSEUM & PLANETARIUM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOREST STEWARDS GUILD ↗
  • Who funds The Land Institute ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND GRASSROOTS ENVIRONMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRBANKS MUSEUM & PLANETARIUM ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NORTHERN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Morrill Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Morrill Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Icivics Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Fairbanks Museum & Planetarium: 7% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Morrill Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Morrill Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Morrill Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph