· Private foundation
Morgan Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $136k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOULDER VALLEY WOMENS HEALTH CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| CAPITAL SISTERS INTERNATIONAL INC | $10,000 |
| CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE | $5,000 |
| AARON MEALS | $5,000 |
| BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| PORTER-LEATH | $5,000 |
| COLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION INC | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC | $5,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $5,000 |
| I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION OF BOULDER COUNTY | $5,000 |
| CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $117k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BVBOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +116%
- CSCAPITAL SISTERS INTERNATIONAL INC4× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +33%
- CCCOLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- LLIMINALone grant, 2022 · $8k
- CBCREATE BOULDERone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -43%
- EIEARTHLINKS INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Colorado organization for latina opportunity and reproductive rights (color) is a community-rooted nonprofit organization that works to enable latinx individuals and their families lead safe, healthy, self-determined lives.
Promote health, quality of life and preservation of the environment in boulder, colorado by building and operating a comprehensive city-wide bike sharing
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
The barton institute supports leaders and their communities who are working to develop and foster places for opportunity, connection, and belonging in metro denver.
The nonprofit boulder chamber is the region's flagship business advocacy and support organization. with almost 120 years of dedicated service to our members and the boulder community, the boulder chamber's innovative programs help local…
Bcap's mission is to provide support, advocacy and education to those in our community who are living with or affected by hiv, and to serve as an outreach and information center to prevent the further transmission of hiv.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zebra Youth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aaron Meals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL SISTERS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHAUTAUQUA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Bridge House ↗
- Who funds Rise Against Suicide ↗
- Who funds PORTER-LEATH ↗
- Who funds GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RADIO FOR NORTHERN COLORADO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds AARON MEALS ↗
- Who funds FOR OAK CLIFF ↗
- Who funds THE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds IMAGINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds CAMFED USA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DARING GIRLS ↗
- Who funds Boulder Alano Club ↗
- Who funds INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds I Have A Dream Foundation Of Boulder County ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ATTENTION INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COUNTY LATINA LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds CREATE BOULDER ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN BRIDGE ANIMAL WELFARE COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation Boulder County · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Boulder Valley Rotary Community Foundation · The Longmont Community Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · L & N Andreas Foundation · Louis P Singer Fund Inc · Emsa Fund Inc · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Morgan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.