Skip to content
Moose International Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Moose International Inc

Moose international is the governing body for a network of fraternal and charitable organizations.

$23M
Granted FY2025still arriving
185
Grants FY2025still arriving
39
States reached
$15M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$39MYouth Development$24MHuman Services$22MPhilanthropy$6.6MMembership Benefit$2.0MRecreation & Sports$331kCommunity Improvement$211kReligion$53kOther$0
02FY2025 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k110 grants · $799k
  • $10k–50k72 grants · $913k
  • $250k+3 grants · $21M
$9,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$304M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY & SCHOOL INC$14,835,659
MOOSEHAVEN INC$4,325,000
MOOSE CHARITIES INC$1,570,452
PALMETTO LODGE 2117$25,000
FINLEYVILLE LODGE 172$21,000
CHESTERTON LODGE 1623$18,000
JACKSONVILLE BEACH LODGE 1558$17,500
ST PETERSBURG LODGE 1145$17,258
TRENTON LODGE 330$17,200
DELAND LODGE 1126$17,000
BIRCH RUN LODGE 2426$16,900
ORLANDO LODGE 766$16,837
GLENDALE LODGE 641$16,500
ATTLEBORO LODGE 463$16,100
SPRINGVILLE LODGE 1249$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Plymouth Lodge 2485: $18k → 8%ATTLEBORO LODGE 463: $16k → 11%Chickies Rock Lodge 307: $16k → 9%FINLEYVILLE LODGE 172: $21k → 12%GLENDALE LODGE 641: $17k → 14%North Port Lodge 764: $20k → 9%Golden Triangle Lodge 874: $15k → 10%PALMETTO LODGE 2117: $25k → 10%Sanford Lodge 1851: $17k → 11%ST PETERSBURG LODGE 1145: $17k → 12%ORLANDO LODGE 766: $17k → 13%Riverview Lodge 2158: $20k → 13%PORT ST LUCIE LODGE 513: $15k → 13%JACKSONVILLE BEACH LODGE 1558: $18k → 14%ST CLAIR SHORES LODGE 1837: $15k → 10%HENDERSON LODGE 1412: $15k → 20%CHESTERTON LODGE 1623: $18k → 9%GOSHEN LODGE 836: $16k → 13%Delaware Lodge 1167: $19k → 5%CELINA LODGE 1473: $16k → 8%Fairborn Lodge 1068: $22k → 9%Sabina Lodge 1244: $17k → 12%MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY & SCHOOL INC: $14.8M → 8%Lodi Lodge 1971: $17k → 7%Warwick Lodge 1711: $16k → 17%FREDERICK LODGE 371: $15k → 6%DELAND LODGE 1126: $17k → 12%BIRCH RUN LODGE 2426: $17k → 18%TRENTON LODGE 330: $17k → 12%Mooseheart Child City & School Inc: $11.6M → 8%SPRINGVILLE LODGE 1249: $16k → 13%LaBelle Lodge 2398: $22k → 21%Lodgic Holdings Inc: $11.1M → 8%Moosehaven Inc: $8.0M → 8%Lodgic Holdings Inc: $7.2M → 8%Mooseheart Child City & School: $5.9M → 8%Mooseheart Child City & School: $5.7M → 8%Lodgic Holdings Inc: $5.3M → 8%MOOSEHAVEN INC: $4.3M → 8%Moosehaven Inc: $3.6M → 8%Moosehaven Inc: $3.2M → 8%Moosehaven Inc: $2.1M → 8%MOOSE CHARITIES INC: $1.6M → 8%Moose Charities Inc: $1.4M → 8%Moose Charities Inc: $1.3M → 8%Moose Charities Inc: $1.2M → 8%Mooseheart Child City & School Inc: $1.2M → 8%Moose Charities Inc: $1.2M → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91M · 36 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 153 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
123

Total granted

$91M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Membership BenefitPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $39M · revenue +46% · 61% of their budget
  • MC
    MOOSE CHARITIES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +74%
  • FL
    FINLEYVILLE LODGE NO 172 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • LL
    LABELLE LODGE 2398 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue +2%
  • FL
    Fairborn Lodge 1068 Loyal Order of Moose
    one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue +21%
  • NP
    North Port Loyal Order of Moose 764graduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holland Lodge #1116 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternity, benevolence and charity.

—
2
Hopewell Lodge No 1472 Loyal Order of the Moose

Unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, and charity. It is accomplished through a year round schedule of recreational & social actvities for the members and their families

—
3
Milford Lodge No 2316 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternalism- the organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benvolence, and charity this is accomplished though a year round schedule of social and recreational activities

—
4
Nisqually Valley Lodge No 1905 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity benevolence and Charity. This is accomplished through a year round schedule of recreational and social activities for the members estimated at 532.

—
5
Williston Lodge No 239 Loyal Order of Moose

This organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, & charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social & recreational activities for the members and their families, estimated to number 1400

—
6
Minot Moose Lodge 822 Loyal Order of Moose

This organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, & charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social & recreational activities for the members and their families, estimated to number 1200

—
7
Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity benevolence and charity. This mission is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families estimated at 3,600.

—
8
Greenville Lodge No 329 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. This is accomplished through a year round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families. Estimated to number 1000.

—
9
Bound Brook Lodge #988 Loyal Order of Moose

Donating to charities

—
10
Venice Lodge No 1308 Loyal Order of Moose

This organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, & charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social & recreational activities for the members and their families estimated to number 6500

—
11
Ohio State Moose Assoc

The lodge unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. this is accomplished thru a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for members

—
12
Ortonville Lodge No 407 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternalism

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyal Oder of the Moose; the most unlike its peers is Sandston Lodge 1937 Loyal Order of Moose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 312 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
295/298
Grantees still filing
105/298
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC: $39,235,659 · OtherMOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INCLODGIC HOLDINGS INC: $23,565,247 · OtherLODGIC HOLDINGS INC+183 more: $2,357,697 · OtherMOOSEHAVEN INC: $21,225,000 · Housing & ShelterMOOSEHAVEN INCMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $6,625,253 · Philanthropy+1 more: $8,706 · PhilanthropySomerville Lodge 2206 Loyal Order of Moose: $18,700 · Membership BenefitREDFORD TOWNSHIP LODGE NO 1743 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,000 · Membership BenefitSCOTT COUNTY MOOSE LODGE NO 2324: $13,900 · Membership BenefitRuskin Lodge 813 Loyal Order of Moose: $12,500 · Membership BenefitCAMBRIDGE LODGE NO 1211 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $11,300 · Membership BenefitHERNDON LODGE NO 2274 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $11,000 · Membership BenefitJersey City Lodge#266: $10,800 · Membership BenefitKALKASKA LODGE 2348 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $10,000 · Membership BenefitCloquet Lodge 1274 Loyal Order of Moose: $9,858 · Membership BenefitRolla Lodge No 587 Loyal Order Of Moose: $8,525 · Membership BenefitAltavista Lodge No 1433 Loyal Order of Moose: $8,000 · Membership BenefitTILLAMOOK LODGE 1260 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC: $10,200 · Community Improvement
Other$65,158,603Housing & Shelter$21,225,000Philanthropy$6,633,959Membership Benefit$129,583Community Improvement$10,200

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC: $39,235,659 over 5y, 61% of budgetLODGIC HOLDINGS INC: $23,565,247 over 3y, 97% of budgetMOOSEHAVEN INC: $21,225,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $6,625,253 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetTrenton Lodge No 330 Loyal Order of Moose: $32,200 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFINLEYVILLE LODGE NO 172 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $26,232 over 2y, 19% of budgetPalmetto Lodge No 2117 Loyal Order of Moose Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSANFORD LODGE NO 1851 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $22,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetStephens City Lodge NO 2483 Loyal Order of Moose: $22,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetLABELLE LODGE 2398 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC: $22,420 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetSOUTH HAVEN LODGE 697 LOYAL ORDER O: $22,025 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetFairborn Lodge 1068 Loyal Order of Moose: $22,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCresent City Moose Lodge 1641 Loyal Order of Moose: $21,953 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetRICHMOND MOOSE LODGE 2575: $21,800 over 2y, 11% of budgetQUINCY LODGE: $20,610 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetNorth Port Loyal Order of Moose 764: $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetRiverview Moose Lodge 2158 Loyal Order of Moose: $20,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWOODSTOWN LODGE NO 932 LOYAL ORDER 932: $20,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetWoburn Lodge No 1214 Loyal Order of Moose: $20,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetThe Delaware Lodge 1167 Loyal Order of Moose Inc: $19,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetMT VERNON LODGE NO 497: $18,800 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetSomerville Lodge 2206 Loyal Order of Moose: $18,700 over 2y, 14% of budgetBlue Ridge Lodge No 2135 Loyal Order of Moose: $18,192 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetEast Sussex Lodge No 2542 Loyal Order of Moose: $18,170 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHESTERTON LODGE NO 1623 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $18,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetLODGE 782 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $18,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPlymouth Lodge 2485 Loyal Order of Moose: $18,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetANN ARBOR LODGE NO 1253 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $17,670 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetJACKSONVILLE BEACH LODGE NO 1558 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $17,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSANTA CRUZ LODGE NO 545 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $17,350 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetSt Petersburg Moose Lodge #1145 Loyal Order of Moo: $17,258 over 1y, 20% of budgetSABINA LODGE NO 1244 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE 1244: $17,200 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetDeland Moose Lodge 1126: $17,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetLODI LODGE NO 1971 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $17,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBIRCH RUN LODGE 2426 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $16,900 over 1y, 10% of budgetORLANDO LODGE 766 LOYAL ORDER: $16,837 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetLOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE NO 741: $16,600 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetGLENDALE LODGE NO 641 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC: $16,500 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetATTLEBORO LODGE 463 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC: $16,100 over 1y, 23% of budgetCHICKIES ROCK LODGE NO 307 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $16,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCELINA LODGE NO 1473 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $16,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWARWICK MOOSE LODGE 1711: $15,944 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetRAINELLE MOOSE LODGE 1647: $15,828 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetGOSHEN LODGE NO 836 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,800 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetMATTOON LODGE 803 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,800 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSLATINGTON LODGE NO 1375 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,550 over 2y, 13% of budgetELKTON LODGE NO 851 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetFREDERICK LODGE NO 371 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE: $15,300 over 1y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moose International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moose International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 490%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    49get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Moose International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Moose International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 312 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moose International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home