How much did Moose International Inc grant in FY2025?

Education$39MYouth Development$24MHuman Services$22MPhilanthropy$6.6MMembership Benefit$2.0MRecreation & Sports$331kCommunity Improvement$211kReligion$53kOther$0

02FY2025 · 185 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k110 grants · $799k
$10k–50k72 grants · $913k
$250k+3 grants · $21M

$9,000

Median grant

States reached

$304M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY & SCHOOL INC	$14,835,659
MOOSEHAVEN INC	$4,325,000
MOOSE CHARITIES INC	$1,570,452
PALMETTO LODGE 2117	$25,000
FINLEYVILLE LODGE 172	$21,000
CHESTERTON LODGE 1623	$18,000
JACKSONVILLE BEACH LODGE 1558	$17,500
ST PETERSBURG LODGE 1145	$17,258
TRENTON LODGE 330	$17,200
DELAND LODGE 1126	$17,000
BIRCH RUN LODGE 2426	$16,900
ORLANDO LODGE 766	$16,837
GLENDALE LODGE 641	$16,500
ATTLEBORO LODGE 463	$16,100
CELINA LODGE 1473	$16,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$91M · 36 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 153 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

123

Total granted

$91M

$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%

+3%

Still filing today

100%

95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Membership BenefitPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MC
MOOSEHEART CHILD CITY AND SCHOOL INC
5× · 2021–2025 · $39M · revenue +46% · 61% of their budget
MC
MOOSE CHARITIES INC
5× · 2021–2025 · $6.6M · revenue +74%
TL
Trenton Lodge No 330 Loyal Order of Moose
2× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +24%

Funded once

LL
LABELLE LODGE 2398 LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE INC
one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue +2%
FL
Fairborn Lodge 1068 Loyal Order of Moose
one grant, 2024 · $22k · revenue +21%
NP
North Port Loyal Order of Moose 764graduated
one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +114%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Holland Lodge #1116 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternity, benevolence and charity.

—

Hopewell Lodge No 1472 Loyal Order of the Moose

Unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, and charity. It is accomplished through a year round schedule of recreational & social actvities for the members and their families

—

Milford Lodge No 2316 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternalism- the organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benvolence, and charity this is accomplished though a year round schedule of social and recreational activities

—

Williston Lodge No 239 Loyal Order of Moose

This organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence, & charity. This is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social & recreational activities for the members and their families, estimated to number 1400

—

Minot Moose Lodge 822 Loyal Order of Moose

—

Newark Lodge No 499 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity benevolence and charity. This mission is accomplished through a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families estimated at 3,600.

—

Greenville Lodge No 329 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. This is accomplished through a year round schedule of social and recreational activities for the members and their families. Estimated to number 1000.

—

Nisqually Valley Lodge No 1905 Loyal Order of Moose

The organization unites its members in the bonds of fraternity benevolence and Charity. This is accomplished through a year round schedule of recreational and social activities for the members estimated at 532.

—

Venice Lodge No 1308 Loyal Order of Moose

—

Ohio State Moose Assoc

The lodge unites its members in the bonds of fraternity, benevolence and charity. this is accomplished thru a year-round schedule of social and recreational activities for members

—

Ortonville Lodge No 407 Loyal Order of Moose

Fraternalism

—

Romney Moose Lodge 1371

To provide services for members to meet and to help the community.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyal Oder of the Moose and the most unlike its peers is Sandston Lodge 1937 Loyal Order of Moose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 91 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1.0%3/312

the rest of the field

12%

8,891/72,047

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

296 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 296 of the 312 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

293/296

Grantees still filing

98/296

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$65,166,603Housing & Shelter$21,225,000Philanthropy$6,633,959Membership Benefit$121,583Community Improvement$10,200

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moose International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

49get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moose International Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moose International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines