Skip to content

· Private foundation

Monroe Welfare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$107k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$142kHealth$78kEducation$28kEnvironment$26kYouth Development$15kHousing & Shelter$14kReligion$11kRecreation & Sports$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$14,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
WOLFSON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$7,250
CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA$7,000
OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA$5,000
HOSPICE SATILLA$5,000
OATH$5,000
BETHESDA ACADEMY SAVANNAH$5,000
BOYS TO MEN$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
EFFINGHAM BACKPACK BUDDIES$2,500
1ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 7%PEACE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $7k → 13%BRANTLEY COUNTY BOE: $14k → 16%PIERCE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 17%OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK: $6k → 18%MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 7%WOLFSON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $10k → 14%BRANTLEY COUNTY BOE: $14k → 16%PIERCE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 17%OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK: $5k → 18%MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 7%WOLFSON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $7k → 14%BETHESDA ACADEMY SAVANNAH: $5k → 16%BRANTLEY COUNTY BOE: $14k → 16%PIERCE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 17%OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK: $5k → 18%MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 7%BETHESDA ACADEMY: $5k → 16%BRANTLEY COUNTY BOE: $12k → 16%PIERCE COUNTY BOE: $12k → 17%OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK: $5k → 18%MCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 7%BRANTLEY COUNTY BOE: $12k → 16%PIERCE COUNTY BOE: $12k → 17%OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK: $5k → 18%CORD OF THREE: $6k → 17%CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5k → 17%CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $36k → 18%CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $33k → 18%CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $20k → 18%WARE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 18%WARE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 18%WARE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 18%WARE COUNTY BOE: $14k → 18%WARE COUNTY BOE: $12k → 18%OATH FOR THE HOMELESS: $8k → 18%BOYS TO MEN: $5k → 17%CORD OF THREE: $7k → 18%BOYS TO MEN: $5k → 17%CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 18%BOYS TO MEN: $5k → 17%CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $7k → 18%CORD OF THREE: $7k → 18%OATH: $6k → 18%KINGDOM CARE: $5k → 18%HOSPICE SATILLA: $5k → 18%MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE OKEFENOKEE: $5k → 18%HOSPICE SATILLA: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$513k · 21 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
18

Total granted

$513k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

14%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +57%
  • HS
    HOSPICE SATILLA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +62%
  • KC
    KINGDOM CARE INCORPORATED
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • OF
    OATH FOR THE HOMELESS
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • MM
    Matties Mission
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -42%
  • PP
    PEACE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc

Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.

Health
2
Orphanos Foundation

Christian-based aid to orphans

Human Services
3
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
4
Oaks Family Care Center Inc

The mission of the oaks family care center is to affirm the sanctity and quality of life by expressing the love of jesus christ through services that support and strnegthen family life and values

Housing & Shelter
5
Trinity Hill Family Services a Mission of the Ucc

Growing out of the understanding of christian scripture of the ucc, with whom trinity hill family services is associated. it's mission is to provide a broad specturm of services to disadvantaged families.

Human Services
6
Church of Brethren Home

Nursing care for the elderly

—
7
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
8
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
9
Oaks Indian Mission Inc

Oaks indian mission provides a faith-based and nurturing environment for children and other vulnerable people to thrive within their communities.

Human Services
10
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports
11
Mt Carmel House Inc

Mt. Carmel House provides complete comfort care and spiritual solace including lodging, food, and other services to the terminally ill, free of charge.

—
12
Crossroads Pregnancy Care

Crossroads Pregnancy Care is a Christ-centered and life-affirming ministry, providing hope, help, and healing to families affected by unplanned pregnancies or hurting from past abortions, and promoting sexual integrity. Social services…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Miracle League of the Okefenokee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oath Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDERS FAMILY YMCA: $102,050 · OtherCHILDERS FAMILY YMCAIndividual grant recipient: $67,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $66,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $66,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK INC: $26,000 · OtherMCARTHUR FAMILY YMCA: $25,720 · OtherHOSPICE SATILLA: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherWOLFSON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $19,250 · Other+27 more: $114,963 · Other+27 moreKINGDOM CARE INCORPORATED: $20,000 · HealthMatties Mission: $7,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE OKEFENOKEE INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsOATH RECOVERY INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCROSSROADS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationBETHESDA RECOVERY INC: $500 · ReligionBoth Hands Foundation: $500 · Human Services
Other$537,483Health$30,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Education$5,000Religion$500Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK INC: $26,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE SATILLA: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetKINGDOM CARE INCORPORATED: $20,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetMatties Mission: $7,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE OKEFENOKEE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetOATH RECOVERY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCROSSROADS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA RECOVERY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoth Hands Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKEFENOKEE SWAMP PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE SATILLA ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM CARE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Matties Mission ↗
  • Who funds THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE OKEFENOKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds OATH RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Monroe Welfare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Monroe Welfare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Monroe Welfare Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Monroe Welfare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monroe Welfare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph