Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Moms the Fund for Mothers With Young Children Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$80kHealth$52kInternational$49kFood & Nutrition$31kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kCommunity Improvement$1k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$8,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$17k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$9,000
HOLY NAME HAITI HEALTH PROMISE$9,000
EDESIA$9,000
CHILDRENS MEDIFUND FO$8,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
THE VILLAGE$4,000
USA FOR UNHCR$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 87% of grant dollars ($196k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($29k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 17%THE VILLAGE: $4k → 11%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%SPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 17%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%SPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 17%HAWKWING: $4k → 11%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%HAWKWING: $1k → 11%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $11k → 14%HOPE FOR TOMORROW: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
MD
AR
DC

Beyond the US — 13% of all-years giving ($29k)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$21k · 4 grants
South Africa$6k · 1 grant
Tanzania$1k · 1 grant
Israel$1k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$147k · 9 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$147k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-40%
+16%

Still filing today

78%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +13%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • SR
    SPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $4k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +4%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue +84%
  • CM
    CHILDRENS MEDIFUND FOR RO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
2
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
5
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
9
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
10
MedGlobal Inc

MedGlobal is a humanitarian non-governmental organization working to serve vulnerable communities around the world by providing innovative, free, and sustainable healthcare. Our health services support refugees, displaced persons, and…

Health
11
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
12
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Childrens Medifund Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Childrens Medifund Corporation — $41,500 · OtherChildrens Medifund CorporationCRUDEM — $20,000 · OtherCRUDEMIndividual grant recipient — $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDRENS MEDIFUND FOR RO — $10,000 · OtherCHILDRENS MEDIFUND FOR ROHOLY NAME HAITI HEALTH PROMISE — $9,000 · OtherHOLY NAME HAITI HEALTH PROMISEIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASINYUSANE — $6,000 · OtherHEIFER INTERNATIONAL — $6,000 · Other+8 more — $10,643 · Other+8 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $23,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRON…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $11,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITC…United States Association for UNHCR — $2,500 · InternationalUnited States Asso…+1 more — $100 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $11,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE…HOPE FOR TOMORROW INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPE FOR TOMOR…HAWKWING INC — $4,500 · Human ServicesHAWKWING INCSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION — $4,251 · Human ServicesSPRINGFIELD RE…THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FO…EDESIA INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionEDESIA INCPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $11,000 · Health
Other$128,643International$36,600Human Services$28,751Food & Nutrition$20,000Health$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildrens Medifund Corporation — $41,500 over 5y, 44% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $23,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDESIA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR TOMORROW INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHAWKWING INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD RESCUE MISSION — $4,251 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR LATINO PROGRESS CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Moms the Fund for Mothers With Young Children Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 50%
  • The Village for Families and Children50% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Moms the Fund for Mothers With Young Children Inc?

Find your warmest path to Moms the Fund for Mothers With Young Children Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph