Skip to content
Moinul and Fahima Khan Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Moinul and Fahima Khan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$49kEducation$49kReligion$38kInternational$20kPhilanthropy$11kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $59k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCA$13,639
SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY$12,000
SONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION$11,700
ECHO$11,200
SOUND VISION FOUNDATION$10,000
RAHMAN ISLAMIC SERVICES$8,000
JUSTICE FOR ALL$5,000
SPAANDANB$5,000
COMPUTER LITERACY PROGRAM$5,000
IQRA FOUNDATION$4,600
CAIR$575
ISLAMIC CENTER OF FREMONT$500
BAITULMAAL$400
ISLAMIC RELIEF$259
MOONLIGHT$236
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION: $12k → 8%ISLAMIC CENTER OF FREMONT: $500 → 10%MOONLIGHT: $236 → 11%GARDEN OF PEACE: $5k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS: $2k → 17%BAITULMAAL: $500 → 14%SOUND VISION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%COMPUTER LITERACY PROGRAM: $5k → 6%ISLAMIC RELIEF: $259 → 9%SONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%BAITULMAAL: $400 → 14%JUSTICE FOR ALL: $5k → 14%COMPUTER LITERACY PROGRAM: $5k → 6%MCA: $27k → 8%ZAKAT FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%MCA: $14k → 8%RAHMAN ISLAMIC SERVICES: $8k → 8%CAIR: $575 → 8%IQRA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%HELPING HAND: $100 → 8%IQRA FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY: $12k → 8%SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 8 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$129k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +63%
  • SB
    SONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +16%
  • IF
    IQRA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TZ
    THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +18%
  • GO
    GARDEN OF PEACE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -96%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
3
Bangladesh American Society of Muslim Aid for Huma
Philanthropy
4
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
5
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Nasrulla Haque Foundation
—
7
Rahma Worldwide Aid and Development

Rahma delivers emergency and development programs to needy communities, without discrimination based on gender, race, religion, or location. we aim to empower and develop individuals and communities affected by hardship globally.

International
8
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Ankur International

Assisting financially challenged patients with life threatening emergency medical conditions. It also helps building charitable healthcare clinics free schools building and running orphanages and provide scholarships to poor needy students…

International
10
International Education and Welfare Society - dba Saba Homes

Provide a holistic upbringing to empower underprivileged and vulnerable individuals to become transformative leaders.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Human Development Foundation of North America

To facilitate a Non-Political Movement for Positive Social Change and Community Empowerment through Mass Literacy, Enhanced Quality of Education,Universal Primary Healthcare and Grassroots Economic Development.

International
12
Isaad foundation

Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baitulmaal Inc; the most unlike its peers is Garden of Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MCA: $40,532 · OtherMCAECHO INC: $22,200 · OtherECHO INCTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,500 · OtherTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICACOMPUTER LITERACY PROGRAM: $10,000 · OtherCOMPUTER LITERACY PROGRAMSOUND VISION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherSOUND VISION FOUNDATIONRAHMAN ISLAMIC SERVICES: $8,000 · OtherRAHMAN ISLAMIC SERVICES+4 more: $1,411 · OtherSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT: $22,000 · EducationSILICON VALLEY…IQRA FOUNDATION INC: $9,600 · InternationalIQRA FOUNDATI…SPAANDANB: $7,500 · InternationalSPAANDANBMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…BAITULMAAL INC: $900 · International+1 more: $259 · InternationalSONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION: $16,700 · HealthSONAR BANGL…JUSTICE FOR ALL: $5,000 · Civil RightsGARDEN OF PEACE: $5,000 · Religion
Other$102,643Education$22,000International$19,759Health$16,700Civil Rights$5,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECHO INC: $22,200 over 2y, 46% of budgetSILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT: $22,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSONAR BANGLA FOUNDATION: $16,700 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIQRA FOUNDATION INC: $9,600 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSPAANDANB: $7,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJUSTICE FOR ALL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARDEN OF PEACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAITULMAAL INC: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $259 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA9.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Moinul and Fahima Khan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Moinul and Fahima Khan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moinul and Fahima Khan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home