· Public charity
Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare
The mission is to enable access to quality mental health services by all mo citizens in need of such services, while maximizing their human potential and quality of life.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of MISSOURI COALITION FOR COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $387k
- $250k+11 grants · $18M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BURRELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $4,870,591 |
| PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE | $3,102,528 |
| COMPASS HEALTH NETWORK | $2,916,267 |
| UNIVERSITY HEALTH (TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER) | $1,719,904 |
| INDEPENDENCE CENTER | $1,604,873 |
| FCC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $1,060,682 |
| REDISCOVER | $857,657 |
| COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER | $601,979 |
| BOOTHEEL COUNSELING SERVICES | $393,850 |
| PLACES FOR PEOPLE | $378,297 |
| GIBSON RECOVERY CENTER | $301,157 |
| COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES | $230,532 |
| SEMO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $156,228 |
| QUEEN OF PEACE | $27,675 |
| NORTH CENTRAL MO MENTAL HEALTH | $9,965 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMPASS HEALTH INC2× · 2024–2025 · $9.1M · revenue +19%
- BIBURRELL INC2× · 2024–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +7%
- GCGibson Center for Behavioral Change3× · 2023–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +22%
Funded once
- BBBJC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHone grant, 2024 · $3.5M
- CHCOMPASS HEALTH NETWORKone grant, 2023 · $3.2M
- MTMARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHone grant, 2023 · $2.9M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
Our mission is to help the people we serve get better, sooner, for longer. centerpointe serves some of the most vulnerable in our communities who have co-occuring mental and physical health diagnoses, and who are experiencing or at risk of…
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.
The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…
Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.
To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Missouri Mental Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Truman Medical Center Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds BURRELL INC ↗
- Who funds PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds Gibson Center for Behavioral Change ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Ozark Center ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Places for People Incorporated ↗
- Who funds TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Rediscover ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Southeast Missouri Behavioral Health Inc ↗
- Who funds MARK TWAIN ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH MARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOOTHEEL COUNSELING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds East Central Missouri Behavioral Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL CHANGE ↗
- Who funds QUEEN OF PEACE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.