· Private foundation
MLB-MLBPA Youth Development Foundation
To improve the caliber, effectiveness and availablility of amateur baseball programs, the quality of baseball education, and the overall participation in baseball and softball its fy2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| But God Ministries | $500,000 |
| Negro leagues Family Alliance | $500,000 |
| New York City Police Foundation | $250,000 |
| Gamers Sports Travel | $250,000 |
| Pitch In For Baseball & Softball | $50,000 |
| Caddo Parish Commission | $50,000 |
| UMPS Care Charities | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| City of Smithers | $10,000 |
| Southside Youth Development Inc | $10,000 |
| West Orange Girls Club Inc | $9,960 |
| Greater Apostolic Temple | $5,812 |
| George Wythe High School | $5,000 |
| City of Henning | $5,000 |
| City of Waupaca | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $938k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $908k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BUT GOD MINISTRIES2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +6%- CBCHICAGO BASEBALL AND EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY INC2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +21%
- RFRIVER FALLS BASEBALL COUNCIL INC2× · 2018–2019 · $850k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- MLMajor League Baseball Youth Foundationone grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue -72%
- TRTEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -63%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NASHVILLEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +46%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Youth Baseball league
Youth Baseball Organization
Youth sports
Youth Education
To run a youth baseball organization
Youth baseball league ages 4-14
To promote youth development
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Major League Baseball Youth Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Roundabout Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Major League Baseball Youth Foundation ↗
- Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO BASEBALL AND EDUCATIONAL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds RIVER FALLS BASEBALL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds PITCCH IN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON NATIONALS YOUTH BASEBALL ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NEGRO LEAGUES FAMILY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PLAYERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INGLEWOOD BASEBALL FUND ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PITCH IN FOR BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL ↗
- Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Gamers Sports Travel ↗
- Who funds GIANTS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds THE JERRY MANUEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAILOR'S SNUG HARBOR LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds LEAD INC ↗
- Who funds PRO YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RED SOX FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES BASEBALL FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON BOYS BASEBALL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Good Sports Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · Major League Baseball Charities Inc · Major League Baseball Players Trust · Tickets for Kids Foundation · Pitch in for Baseball and Softball · The Players Alliance Inc · Fantasy Camps for Kids · Major League Baseball Youth Foundation · Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Womens Sports Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization MLB-MLBPA Youth Development Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wefam United Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.