Skip to content
Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$77kArts & Culture$75kCivil Rights$52kHousing & Shelter$51kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kHealth$12kPublic Benefit$6kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$50,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE$2,500
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM$2,000
CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING$2,000
PUBLIC BROADCASTING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE: $2k → 8%CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING: $2k → 10%CA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY: $2k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50k → 17%OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 21%CARE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 13%CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING: $2k → 10%SOCAL PUBLIC RADIO: $5k → 14%ASCAP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $10k → 14%CARE INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 13%CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING: $2k → 10%JOY IN BIRTHING FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%SNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 11%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 11%ASCAP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%HARMONY PROJECT: $5k → 14%SNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER: $5k → 11%EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC: $5k → 14%ASCAP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%ASCAP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $10k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $5k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $4k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM: $2k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $10k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $6k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $6k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $6k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $6k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $5k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $3k → 17%UNICEF: $10k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $3k → 17%UNICEF: $10k → 17%NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE: $3k → 17%UNICEF: $5k → 17%BREAST CANCER RESEARCH: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 16 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$197k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+1%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalCrime & LegalHealthEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +81%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +36%
  • SH
    SNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $16k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • OI
    OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • YM
    YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%
  • ET
    EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
4
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
5
The Philharmonic Symphony Society of Ny Inc

See schedule o.the mission of the new york philharmonic encompasses the following key attributes:(1) to maintain and foster an interest in the enjoyment of music and musical affairs; (2) to inculcate an interest in symphonic music among…

Arts & Culture
6
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
7
Community-Word Project Inc

Our mission is to facilitate culturally responsive, multidisciplinary art programs for students, teaching artists, and communities to develop and amplify their voices and creative skills.

Education
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
10
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC: $46,513 · OtherNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INCOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · OtherOPTIMIST INTERNATIONALCARE INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · OtherCARE INTERNATIONALPUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM (PBS): $7,000 · OtherThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $6,000 · OtherBREAST CANCER RESEARCH: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+9 more: $9,000 · Other+9 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $31,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committ…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICE…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalASCAP FOUNDATION: $11,500 · Arts & CultureASCAP FOUNDATIONEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $10,700 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROUGH…YOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MUSICIANS F…NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC R…EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureEDUCATION THROUGH…+2 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentHarmony Project: $5,000 · EducationAdvocates for Children of New York: $2,000 · Crime & LegalSTOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE INC: $2,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $2,000 · HealthST MARY'S HEALTHCARE: $1,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$148,513International$77,000Arts & Culture$46,200Environment$16,000Education$5,000Crime & Legal$4,000Health$3,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC: $46,513 over 9y, 89% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $31,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSNUG HARBOR CULTURAL CENTER AND BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASCAP FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC: $10,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MUSICIANS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAdvocates for Children of New York: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP HANDGUN VIOLENCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S HEALTHCARE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mizzy Jonas Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mizzy Jonas Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home