Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mize Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Mize Family Foundation’s FY2026 grant dollars went to Jefferson Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2026 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Mize Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $250k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
’17
8
’18
11
’19
10
’20
11
’21
13
’22
7
’23
4
’24
2
’25
0
’26

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$575kInternational$510kCivil Rights$260kArts & Culture$240kPhilanthropy$195kPublic Benefit$140kCommunity Improvement$75kHuman Services$60kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOMA$20,000
HONOR THE EARTH$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THOUSAND CURRENTS$20,000
XOESE THE FRANCOPHONE WOMEN'S FUND$20,000
AKASHINGA INC$20,000
AGROECOLOGY FUND AFRICA$20,000
URGENT ACTION FUND FOR WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS$20,000
CHISHOLM LEGACY PROJECT INC$20,000
SAMBURU WOMEN TRUST$15,000
CENTER FOR DIVERSITY & THE ENVIRONMENT$15,000
WOMEN FUND TANZANIA TRUST$15,000
WOMIN AFRICAN ALLIANCE$15,000
ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($270k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%latino community fund of washington state: $25k → 9%latino community fund of washington state: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($270k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$70k · 3 grants
Tanzania$55k · 3 grants
South Africa$50k · 3 grants
Togo$40k · 2 grants
Ghana$40k · 2 grants
Kenya$15k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Mize Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mize Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 25 repeat orgs$345k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
16

Total granted

$1.9M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+50%

Still filing today

60%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THOUSAND CURRENTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +378%
  • UA
    URGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +311%
  • EL
    ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $140k · revenue +277%

Funded once

  • UN
    UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +333%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AC
    ACTBLUE CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -97%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
3
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
4
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
5
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
8
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
11
Partnership for Policy Integrity

Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.

Environment
12
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thousand Currents; the most unlike its peers is Akashinga Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $140,150 · OtherENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWI…WOMIN AFRICAN ALLIANCE: $80,000 · OtherWOMIN AFRICAN ALLIANCEFRIDA: $70,000 · OtherFRIDAAGROECOLOGY FUND AFRICA: $60,000 · OtherAGROECOLOGY FUND AFRICAIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAMBURU WOMEN TRUST: $55,000 · OtherSAMBURU WOMEN TRUSTWOMEN FUND TANZANIA TRUST: $55,000 · OtherWOMEN FUND TANZANIA TRUSTXOESE THE FRANCOPHONE WOMEN'S FUND: $40,000 · OtherBOMA: $40,000 · OtherWOMEN'S AGRI-ENVIRO VISION: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherAKASHINGA INC: $40,000 · Other+12 more: $225,105 · Other+12 moreJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $714,000 · PhilanthropyJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…TIDES FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION+2 more: $35,000 · PhilanthropyTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $200,000 · InternationalTHOUSAND CURRENTSURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $195,260 · InternationalURGENT ACTION FUND FOR…FRONT LINE USA FOUNDATION: $130,000 · InternationalFRONT LINE USA FOUNDAT…Na'ah Illahee Fund: $50,000 · InternationalNa'ah Illahee FundGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $50,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN …HONOR THE EARTH: $160,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE E…NEW VENTURE FUND: $55,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE…Front and Centered: $40,000 · EnvironmentFront and C…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $30,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREE…Center for Diversity and the Environment: $15,000 · EnvironmentInternational Rivers Network: $15,000 · EnvironmentGlobal Press Institute: $140,000 · Arts & CultureFIRST PEOPLES FUND: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH SEATTLE EMERALD: $40,000 · Arts & CultureKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHISHOLM LEGACY PROJECT INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsThe Partnership Project: $10,000 · Civil RightsLatino Community Fund of Washington State: $45,000 · Human ServicesIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $35,000 · Human Services
Other$940,255Philanthropy$794,000International$625,260Environment$315,000Arts & Culture$240,000Civil Rights$95,000Human Services$80,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $200,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetURGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM: $195,260 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $160,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE: $140,150 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGlobal Press Institute: $140,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFRONT LINE USA FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CHISHOLM LEGACY PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund: $50,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLatino Community Fund of Washington State: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFront and Centered: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFIRST PEOPLES FUND: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH SEATTLE EMERALD: $40,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRVC SEATTLE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Diversity and the Environment: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetINTERTRIBAL AGRICULTURE COUNCIL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rivers Network: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Partnership Project: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds URGENT ACTION FUND FOR FEMINIST ACTIVISM ↗
  • Who funds HONOR THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Global Press Institute ↗
  • Who funds FRONT LINE USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHISHOLM LEGACY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Na'ah Illahee Fund ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Latino Community Fund of Washington State ↗
  • Who funds Front and Centered ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PEOPLES FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SEATTLE EMERALD ↗
  • Who funds AKASHINGA INC ↗
  • Who funds Illumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ACTBLUE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds RVC SEATTLE ↗
  • Who funds KUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC22.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Seattle Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Impactassetsinc · United Philanthropy Forum · Laird Norton Family Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Doll Family Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mize Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mize Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mize Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mize Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mize Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph