Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$73k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$59kYouth Development$45kEducation$25kCommunity Improvement$20kPhilanthropy$20kHuman Services$20kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Carle Development Foundation$25,000
Boys and Girls Club$25,000
Community Development Corporation$10,000
Big BrothersBig Sisters$5,000
Marcfirst$5,000
Illinois Chapter of COPS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%American Red Cross: $5k → 14%Marcfirst: $5k → 11%Marcfirst: $5k → 11%Marcfirst: $5k → 11%Marcfirst: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$128k · 7 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$128k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+13%

Still filing today

29%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2020–2023 · $55k · revenue +38%
  • BB
    Big BrothersBig Sisters
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k
  • LA
    LIFELONG ACCESS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • EC
    EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -7%
  • HC
    HEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -43%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
2
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
3
The Cardiac Institute

Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.

Health
4
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
5
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
6
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
7
Mcleod Physician Associates Ii

Mcleod physician associates ii operates as a part of the mcleod health system. the mission of mcleod health is to improve the overall health and well being of people living within south carolina and eastern north carolina by providing…

Health
8
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
9
Rush Copley Medical Center

To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
11
Carle BroMenn Medical Center

To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and improve health by proviidng highly accessible, world-class care and services.

Health
12
Alzheimer's Impact Movement

To advance and develop policies to overcome alzheimer's and all other dementia through increased investment in research, enhanced care and improved support.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carle Development Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Partners for Community Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys and Girls Club: $25,000 · OtherBoys and Girls ClubHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONBig BrothersBig Sisters: $20,000 · OtherBig BrothersBig SistersSt Jude: $15,000 · OtherSt JudeCommunity Development Corporation: $10,000 · OtherCommunity Development CorporationMichael Collins Foundation: $7,500 · OtherMichael Collins FoundationIllinois Chapter of COPS: $6,500 · OtherIllinois Chapter of COPSCOPS: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross &…LIFELONG ACCESS: $20,000 · Human ServicesLIFELONG ACCESSEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $25,000 · HealthEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLI…Carle Development Foundation: $25,000 · HealthCarle Development Founda…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RE…MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · HealthMCLEAN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementPARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBest Buddies International Inc: $10,000 · InternationalKAY YOW CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$115,500Human Services$75,000Health$62,500Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$10,000International$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEARTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCarle Development Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELONG ACCESS: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCLEAN COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetPARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAY YOW CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA13.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mitsubishi Motors USA Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mitsubishi Motors USA’s filings →

More from the funding graph