Skip to content
Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare

The mission is to enable access to quality mental health services by all mo citizens in need of such services, while maximizing their human potential and quality of life.

$18M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$48MHousing & Shelter$1.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $387k
  • $250k+11 grants · $18M
$601,979
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURRELL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$4,870,591
PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE$3,102,528
COMPASS HEALTH NETWORK$2,916,267
UNIVERSITY HEALTH (TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER)$1,719,904
INDEPENDENCE CENTER$1,604,873
FCC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$1,060,682
REDISCOVER$857,657
COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER$601,979
BOOTHEEL COUNSELING SERVICES$393,850
PLACES FOR PEOPLE$378,297
GIBSON RECOVERY CENTER$301,157
COMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$230,532
SEMO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$156,228
QUEEN OF PEACE$27,675
NORTH CENTRAL MO MENTAL HEALTH$9,965
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%FCC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $1.3M → 26%FCC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $1.1M → 26%HEARTLAND CENTER: $185k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 17 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$34M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
0%

Still filing today

82%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMPASS HEALTH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $9.1M · revenue +19%
  • BI
    BURRELL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +7%
  • GC
    Gibson Center for Behavioral Change
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BB
    BJC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2024 · $3.5M
  • CH
    COMPASS HEALTH NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $3.2M
  • MT
    MARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $2.9M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
2
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
3
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
4
Centerpointe Inc

Our mission is to help the people we serve get better, sooner, for longer. centerpointe serves some of the most vulnerable in our communities who have co-occuring mental and physical health diagnoses, and who are experiencing or at risk of…

Health
5
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
6
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
7
Maine Behavioral Health Organization

The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…

Health
8
Open Hearts Family Wellness

Open hearts provides comprehensive mental health services in coordination with medical providers. the services are medically necessary with specific diagnosis and treatment to reduce symptoms,prevent illness, and increase quality of life.

Human Services
9
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
10
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
11
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
12
Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center Inc

To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Missouri Mental Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Truman Medical Center Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMPASS HEALTH INC: $9,054,683 · HealthCOMPASS HEALTH INCPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC: $3,742,864 · HealthPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INCGibson Center for Behavioral Change: $2,336,904 · HealthGibson Center for Behavioral ChangeOzark Center: $2,155,516 · HealthOzark CenterPlaces for People Incorporated: $1,802,623 · HealthPlaces for People IncorporatedTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED: $1,719,904 · HealthTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED+9 more: $3,553,317 · Health+9 moreBURRELL INC: $6,037,624 · OtherBURRELL INCBJC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $3,487,750 · OtherBJC BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCOMPASS HEALTH NETWORK: $3,237,225 · OtherCOMPASS HEALTH NETWORKMARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $2,940,179 · OtherMARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $1,866,693 · OtherINDEPENDENCE CENTERALM HOPEWELL CENTER: $1,309,197 · OtherALM HOPEWELL CENTERCOMPREHENSIVE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $1,225,695 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,153,947 · OtherRediscover: $857,657 · Other+4 more: $1,256,475 · Other+4 moreFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $2,326,851 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL CHANGE: $184,727 · Human Services
Health$24,365,811Other$23,372,442Human Services$2,511,578

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMPASS HEALTH INC: $9,054,683 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBURRELL INC: $6,037,624 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC: $3,742,864 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetGibson Center for Behavioral Change: $2,336,904 over 3y, 17% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $2,326,851 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOzark Center: $2,155,516 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE CENTER: $1,866,693 over 3y, 11% of budgetPlaces for People Incorporated: $1,802,623 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER INCORPORATED: $1,719,904 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRediscover: $857,657 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER: $747,317 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSoutheast Missouri Behavioral Health Inc: $645,196 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetMARK TWAIN ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH MARK TWAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $547,571 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $478,320 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH RESPONSE INC: $448,425 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $388,635 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEast Central Missouri Behavioral Health Services Inc: $239,160 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL MISSOURI MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $230,590 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHEARTLAND CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL CHANGE: $184,727 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetQUEEN OF PEACE CENTER: $79,449 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Health Forward Founda…Amazonsmile Foundation
Health Forward FoundationMO13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Health Forward Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Missouri Coalition for Community Behavioral Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home