· Public charity
Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation
MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION is the fund development organization for missouri baptist medical center (mbmc).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
- $250k+1 grant · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER | $11,687,727 |
| MISSOURI BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF SULLIVAN | $55,266 |
| BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| BJC HEALTHSYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE | $30,000 |
| HAVEN HOUSE | $30,000 |
| ANNIE'S HOPE | $22,000 |
| GATEWAY TO HOPE | $20,000 |
| CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY | $10,225 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $275k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GTGATEWAY TO HOPE8× · 2017–2024 · $570k · revenue +274%
- OFOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC2× · 2018–2021 · $215k · revenue +13%
- GIGIVING IS A FAMILY TRADITION3× · 2021–2023 · $159k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- TOTHE OASIS INSTITUTEone grant, 2023 · $44k · revenue +16%
- RARADIO ARTS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +14%
- HSHOSCO SHIFT INCone grant, 2021 · $12k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Center for patient safety seeks to reduce preventable patient harm by improving patient safety culture, working in collaboration with providers, associations and government entities.
Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Care to terminal patients/families
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…
To provide nutritional support and enhance the quality of life of men, women, and children living with hiv/aids or cancer
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
To eliminate underlying causes of health inequities, transform systems and enable individuals and communities to thrive
Inspired by the jewish tradition to make the world a better place, jfs helps and supports people in need to meet their challenges. through a comprehensive range of services, including a food pantry, older adult services, clinical services,…
To improve the lives of greater st. louis' residents by convening strategic community partnerships.
In the tradition of the sisters of st. joseph of carondelet and in partnership with benedictine, nazareth living center participates in the healing ministry of jesus ministering with compassion and responding creatively to the needs of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The St Louis Bereavement Center for Young People and the most unlike its peers is Rx Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RX Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY TO HOPE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING IS A FAMILY TRADITION ↗
- Who funds THE ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE OF CONCERN ↗
- Who funds HEALING HEARTS GRIEF SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds BJC HEALTH SYSTEM DBA BJC HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds THE OASIS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HAVENHOUSE ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds RADIO ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSCO SHIFT INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds INFANT LOSS RESOURCES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital · The St Louis Men's Group Against Cancer · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Julian I & Hope R Edison Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Washington University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Missouri Baptist Healthcare Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.