Skip to content

· Public charity

Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District

Promoting responsible and sustainable year-round tourism.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$281kArts & Culture$48kEnvironment$8kYouth Development$7kCommunity Improvement$5kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $58,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $109,209 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,709 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
$14,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUTDOOR BLOGGER SUMMIT$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA ADAMS CENTER$14,000
MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER$7,500
WARRIOR MOVEMENT$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SUSAN G KOMEN IDAHO MONTANA: $5k → 8%PACIFIC NW COLLEGIATE LACROSSE PLAYOFFS- MONTANA GRIZZLY LACROSSE: $10k → 9%STEVENSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 11%WARRIOR MOVEMENT: $7k → 17%OUTDOOR BLOGGER SUMMIT: $30k → 8%THE ORVIS COMPANY: $10k → 11%MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL - BIG SKY HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 9%BITTERROOT CULTURAL HERITAGE TRUST: $10k → 11%OUTDOOR BLOGGER SUMMIT: $30k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA ADAMS CENTER: $14k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $14k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA ADAMS CENTER: $14k → 9%MONTANA MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURE: $13k → 9%ZOOTOWN 406 CLASSIC CLUB - ZOOTOWN BASKETBALL YOUTH CLUB: $7k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA ENTERTAINMENT MANAGEMENT: $5k → 9%MTCX: $8k → 9%MISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 9%MONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER: $8k → 9%MTCX: $8k → 9%MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL - SENTINEL HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 9%MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL - HELLGATE HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 9%AMERICAN LEGION REGIONAL TOURNAMENT PLANNING COMMITTEE: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in MT; by stated purpose, 76%.

Missoula Tourism Business Improvement Districtlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$253k · 7 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$253k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

43%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY ASSN
    7× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +23%
  • MM
    MISSOULA MOUNTAIN BIKE COALITION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • AC
    A CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -24%
  • BR
    BITTER ROOT CULTURAL HERITAGE TRUST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scenic Montana Trails
—
2
Missoula Midtown Foundation

Funding and conducting research on issues associated with the ongoing development, infrastructure, historical preservation, and planning of Missoula Midtown and operating educational programs to educate the public about these issues.

Community Improvement
3
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
4
The Montana Land Reliance

The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.

Environment
5
Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation

To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.

Environment
6
Montana State Parks Foundation

The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.

Recreation & Sports
7
Missoula Fairgrounds Foundation

The organization's primary purpose is to preserve a place of community connection that renews curiosity in our rural roots while ensuring that iconic western montana traditions live for future generations. the organization supports capital…

Arts & Culture
8
Montana Amateur Hockey Association Inc

To promote, regulate and govern amateur hockey in the state of montana.

Recreation & Sports
9
Mission Valley Aquatics

State-of-the-art pool and fitness center providing members of the mission valley community with opportunities to improve their quality of life through health and fitness in a positive, well-structured and safe environment. programs…

Recreation & Sports
10
Montana Tennis Association

To promote and develop the growth of tennis in the state of montana.

—
11
Friends of Missoula Parks Inc

FMP is dedicated to enhancing the well-being of our community through the promotion and support of recreational spaces. We champion the development, maintenance, and conservation of parks, trails, and forestry in Missoula, Montana, and the…

Environment
12
Missoula Strikers Soccer Association Inc

Our mission: fostering personal and community growth through soccer.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missoula Area Youth Hockey Assn; the most unlike its peers is Bitter Root Cultural Heritage Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OUTDOOR BLOGGER SUMMIT: $60,000 · OtherOUTDOOR BLOGGER SUMMITTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA: $47,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAMISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $21,349 · OtherMISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSMTCX: $15,000 · OtherMTCXBITTER ROOT CULTURAL HERITAGE TRUST INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE ORVIS COMPANY: $10,000 · OtherWARRIOR MOVEMENT: $7,000 · OtherZOOTOWN 406 CLASSIC CLUB - ZOOTOWN BASKETBALL YOUTH CLUB: $6,500 · Other+3 more: $16,000 · Other+3 moreMISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY ASSN: $85,000 · Youth DevelopmentMISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY …MISSOULA MOUNTAIN BIKE COALITION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMISSOULA MOUNTAI…A CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsA CAROUSEL FOR M…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS…MONTANA GRIZZLY LACROSSE: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA GRIZZLY …MISSOULA LEGION HELLGATE POST 27 BASEBALL PROGRAM: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsMISSOULA LEGION …THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationMONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER: $7,500 · EnvironmentMISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$192,849Youth Development$85,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Education$13,000Environment$7,500Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSOULA AREA YOUTH HOCKEY ASSN: $85,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMISSOULA MOUNTAIN BIKE COALITION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA CAROUSEL FOR MISSOULA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMONTANA NATURAL HISTORY CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMISSOULA DOWNTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMISSOULA SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Community Foundation IncMT15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District?

    Find your warmest path to Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Missoula Tourism Business Improvement District’s filings →

    More from the funding graph