Skip to content
Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc

Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.

$709k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$576k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$92k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
  • $250k+1 grant · $576k
$12,364
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAVALLI COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$575,847
AREA II AGENCY ON AGING$26,181
ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA$16,364
AREA IX AGENCY ON AGING$14,364
RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA$13,364
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$12,364
AREA VIII AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
AREA V AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
AREA X AGENCY ON AGING$8,264
NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING$8,264
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $16k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $18k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $14k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $14k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $16k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $11k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $13k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $16k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $7k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $10k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $15k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $7k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $10k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $15k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $7k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $10k → 10%AREA I AGENCY ON AGING: $15k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $6k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $7k → 10%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $13k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $9k → 16%NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING: $5k → 20%RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA: $7k → 10%AREA I AGENCY ON AGING: $11k → 12%AREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 16%ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.2M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$5.2M
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG)
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +181%
  • AI
    AREA II AGENCY ON AGING
    9× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +37%
  • AF
    ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +9%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Seniorage Area Agency On Aging

    A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.

    Human Services
    2
    Albert Gallatin Human Service Agency Inc

    Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.

    Human Services
    3
    Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc

    To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.

    —
    4
    Jackson County Council On Aging

    Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

    Human Services
    5
    Council On Aging & Human Services

    Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.

    Human Services
    6
    Gillespie County Committee On Aging iNC

    Nutrition and social services for senior citizens

    Human Services
    7
    Midland Area Agency On Aging

    The mission of midland area agency on aging is to provide caring and quality services to older adults and their families that enable independent living with dignity in their homes and communities.

    Human Services
    8
    Eastern Area Agency on Aging

    It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.

    Human Services
    9
    Washington County Commission On Aging Inc/Area Agency On Aging

    To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…

    —
    10
    Jefferson County Area Agency on Aging

    Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania

    —
    11
    Heritage Area Agency On Aging

    Heritage area agency on aging (heritage) serves the needs of older adults, caregivers, their families and people with disabilities in the following ways: planning: developing and implementing plans that identify and meet the needs of older…

    Human Services
    12
    Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging

    Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Area Agency On Aging Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sela Senci (Think Young). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    8/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG): $4,325,637 · HealthSELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG)AREA II AGENCY ON AGING: $155,897 · OtherAREA II A…WESTERN MONTANA AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING INC: $92,669 · OtherWESTERN M…CASCADE COUNTY TREASURER: $86,016 · OtherCASCADE C…FLATHEAD COUNTY: $85,082 · OtherFLATHEAD …CLERK & RECORDER-HILL COUNTY: $38,006 · OtherCLERK & R…ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $130,711 · Human ServicesHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $86,182 · Human ServicesAREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $82,408 · Human ServicesNORTH CENTRAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $47,626 · Human ServicesROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $91,863 · Community Improvement
    Health$4,325,637Other$457,670Human Services$346,927Community Improvement$91,863

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAREA II AGENCY ON AGING: $155,897 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA: $130,711 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERN MONTANA AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING INC: $92,669 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $91,863 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $86,182 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAREA V AGENCY ON AGING: $82,408 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $47,626 over 8y, 0.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG) ↗
    • Who funds AREA II AGENCY ON AGING ↗
    • Who funds ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA ↗
    • Who funds WESTERN MONTANA AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
    • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
    • Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
    • Who funds AREA V AGENCY ON AGING ↗
    • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $728k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Missoula Area Agency on Aging’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home