· Public charity
Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc
Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
- $250k+1 grant · $576k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RAVALLI COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING | $575,847 |
| AREA II AGENCY ON AGING | $26,181 |
| ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA | $16,364 |
| AREA IX AGENCY ON AGING | $14,364 |
| RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA | $13,364 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL | $12,364 |
| AREA VIII AGENCY ON AGING | $11,364 |
| AREA V AGENCY ON AGING | $11,364 |
| AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING | $11,364 |
| AREA X AGENCY ON AGING | $8,264 |
| NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING | $8,264 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $347k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSSELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG)9× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +181%
- AIAREA II AGENCY ON AGING9× · 2017–2025 · $156k · revenue +37%
- AFACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +9%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.
To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.
The mission of midland area agency on aging is to provide caring and quality services to older adults and their families that enable independent living with dignity in their homes and communities.
It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options, and services for seniors, adults with disabilities, and caregivers.
To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…
Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania
Heritage area agency on aging (heritage) serves the needs of older adults, caregivers, their families and people with disabilities in the following ways: planning: developing and implementing plans that identify and meet the needs of older…
Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.
To provide services to persons over 55 in planning district 12 of virginia.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Area Agency On Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sela Senci (Think Young). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SELA SENCI (THINK YOUNG) ↗
- Who funds AREA II AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA ↗
- Who funds WESTERN MONTANA AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
- Who funds AREA V AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.