Loading…
· Public charity
MISSOULA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC
To promote the independence, dignity and health of older adults and those who care for them.
$709k
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
1
Communities
$576k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Health$4.0MHuman Services$307kCommunity Improvement$82kOther$410k
02FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $117k
- $250k+1 grant · $576k
$12,364
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
- RAVALLI COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$575,847
- AREA II AGENCY ON AGING$26,181
- ACTION FOR EASTERN MONTANA$16,364
- AREA IX AGENCY ON AGING$14,364
- RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA$13,364
- ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$12,364
- AREA VIII AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
- AREA V AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
- AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING$11,364
- NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING$8,264
- AREA X AGENCY ON AGING$8,264
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $307k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 77% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
11
0
Total granted
$4.8M
$0
Still filing today
73%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRAVALLI COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING8× · 2018–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +199%
- AIAREA II AGENCY ON AGING8× · 2018–2025 · $137k · revenue +23%
- AIAREA I AGENCY ON AGING8× · 2018–2025 · $116k · revenue +19%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
Human Services
2
Missouri Association of Area Agencies On Aging
Serve as a statewide entity to focus public and private attention on the changing needs and concerns of Missouri's elder population and establish a network for consumer outreach and assistance for public benefits.
—
3
Midland Area Agency On Aging
Services to persons over age 60 to help them remain in their homes.
Human Services
4
Routt County Council On Aging Inc
Our mission is to determine the needs of older adults in Routt County and to make every effort to meet those needs with appropriate action.
Human Services
5
Missoula Area Agency On Aging Inc
To promote the independence, dignity and health of older adults and those who care for them.
Human Services
6
Area Agency On Aging of Western
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
Human Services
7
Albert Gallatin Human Service
Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.
Human Services
8
Auglaize County Council On Aging
To provide services to the elderly of auglaize county.
Human Services
9
Eastern Area Agency on Aging
It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options and services for seniors, adults with disabilities and caregivers.
Human Services
10
Council on Aging Services for Seniors
The Council on Aging provides essential services to our senior community through an integrated network of programs working together to fulfill our clients' needs. We currently have 12 programs including: Meals on Wheels, Senior Dining…
—
11
Area Agency On Aging Region X
Enable Missourians in Jasper, Newton, McDonald, and Barton counties to remain in their homes as long as possible and enhance their quality of life through social and nutritional services.
Human Services
12
Aroostook Area Agency on Aging Inc
To assist eldery citizens in northern Maine.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Area Agency On Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sela Senci (Think Young). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$3,973,270Other$410,276Human Services$307,044Community Improvement$81,864
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RAVALLI COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds AREA II AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds AREA I AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds AREA V AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds RSVP OF SOUTHWEST MONTANA ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL AREA III AGENCY ON AGING ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MISSOULA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +87% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 810345779 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AREA VI AGENCY ON AGING, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc?
Find your warmest path to Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines