Skip to content

Montana · Public charity

Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc

Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.

$709k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$12,364
Largest grant, FY2024
$575,847
Organizations funded a year
9 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$9.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$709k0%
FY202311$655k0%
FY202211$939k0%
FY202111$766k0%
FY202011$637k0%
FY201911$594k0%
FY201811$472k18%
FY20179$450kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.2MHuman Services$2.0MCommunity Improvement$92k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sela Senci (Think Young)$4,325,6379n/a
Area II Agency on Aging$155,89790%
Action for Eastern Montana$130,71190%
Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc$92,66991%
Rocky Mountain Development Council$91,86390%
Human Resource Development Council of District IX Inc$86,18290%
Cascade County Treasurer$86,0169n/a
Flathead County$85,0829n/a
Area V Agency on Aging$82,40891%
North Central Area Agency on Aging Inc$47,62681%
Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sela Senci (Think Young)$4,325,6379n/a
Area II Agency on Aging$155,89790%
Action for Eastern Montana$130,71190%
Western Montana Area VI Agency on Aging Inc$92,66991%
Rocky Mountain Development Council$91,86390%
Human Resource Development Council of District IX Inc$86,18290%
Cascade County Treasurer$86,0169n/a
Flathead County$85,0829n/a
Area V Agency on Aging$82,40891%
North Central Area Agency on Aging Inc$47,62681%
Clerk & Recorder-Hill County$38,0067n/a

Compare Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc with peer funders

About Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc

How much does Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc give?
Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc reported 11 grants totaling $709,104 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (60%), Human Services (38%), Community Improvement (2%).
Who are Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Sela Senci (Think Young) ($4.3M), Area II Agency on Aging ($156k), Action for Eastern Montana ($131k).
Does Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc based?
Missoula Area Agency on Aging Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $728k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Missoula Area Agency on Aging’s filings →

More from the funding graph