· Public charity
Mission Increase
MISSION INCREASE equips donors, nonprofits, and churches to multiply their collective kingdom impact, so that more lives are transformed for jesus.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $395,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $433,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $38,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $195k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD KNIGHTS INC | $100,000 |
| CORBAN UNIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE | $30,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP OF COMPANIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
| SATELLITE GAMING | $25,000 |
| SPIRIT OF FAITH ADOPTIONS INC (SOFA) | $20,000 |
| DANCE 4 JOY MINISTRIES | $20,000 |
| CORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| WESTERN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| BENCHMARK ADVENTURE MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| THE JOURNEY HOME INC | $10,000 |
| HEART REACH NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| REFUGE HOST HOMES | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $118k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $340k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRISAAC'S ROOM3× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue +102%
- SGSATELLITE GAMING4× · 2020–2024 · $68k · revenue +92%
- CPCORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES4× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- LPLuis Palau Associationone grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +9%
- BFBORLAND FREE CLINICone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -36%
- GLGENEROUS LIFE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +61%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Training pastors and leaders in christian faith
Biblical counseling
Religious
Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
Evangelical services for youth and adults at various summer camps and mission trips where they have the opportunity to encounter gods presence.
Religious
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Narrow Gate Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds BORLAND FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GOOD KNIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds GENEROUS LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds ISAAC'S ROOM ↗
- Who funds SATELLITE GAMING ↗
- Who funds DOVETAIL IMPACT FOUNDATION (FKA DAVID WEEKLEY FAMILY FOUNDATION) ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE PREGNANCY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CHRISTIAN VIRTUE ↗
- Who funds CHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Fellowship of Companies For Christ ↗
- Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF OHIO ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT OF FAITH ADOPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds TRELLIS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds BENCHMARK ADVENTURE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MY SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds THE JUDITH E & JOSEPH C COOK JR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds DANCE 4 JOY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds THE IMPACT MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds AKRON YOUTH MENTORSHIP ↗
- Who funds Renovare Music Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp David of the Ozarks Inc ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS FOLD RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds PONDEROSA PINES CHRISTIAN CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN YOUTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds Camp Deer Run Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp Sonshine ↗
- Who funds INSPIRATION HILLS INC ↗
- Who funds Beachmont Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHALOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SWEET SLEEP INC ↗
- Who funds CHO-YEH CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Outreach Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: In His Steps Foundation · Christ Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mission Increase funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Isaac's Room — 5% of income from government
- Corban University — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.