Skip to content
Misac Corporation at a glance

· Public charity

Misac Corporation

To provide housing to qualified families.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$324kHousing & Shelter$291kHuman Services$260kPhilanthropy$256kFood & Nutrition$106kPublic Benefit$93kCommunity Improvement$25kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $97,090, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,160 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $91k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARC INC OF MANCHESTER$46,036
SECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$45,000
MACC$6,054
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$695k · 7 repeat orgs$419k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$695k
$374k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+5%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    TLC FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $230k · revenue +82% · 68% of their budget
  • JH
    JOURNEY HOME INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $122k · revenue +700%
  • MI
    MARC INC OF MANCHESTER
    3× · 2022–2025 · $111k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INCgraduated
    2× · 2018–2019 · $205k · revenue +52%
  • OV
    ORFORD VILLAGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP C/O MALCOLM BARLOW ATTY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +3%
  • LI
    LOCAL INITIATIVE SUPPORT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

—
2
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
3
Eastern Connecticut Housing Opportunities Inc

Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.

Housing & Shelter
4
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Britain

The corporation is engaged in encouraging the cooperative efforts of neighborhood representatives, government and participating lending institutions in a combined effort to stem the decline and deterioration of the housing within the city…

Housing & Shelter
5
Connecticut Association of Health Care Facilities Inc

The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…

—
6
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
7
Connecticut Community Care Inc

Connecticut community care, inc provides person-centered care coordination and transition services for elders and individuals with disabilities to help ensure they can live safely in the place they choose to live. people served experience…

Health
8
Connecticut Health Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
9
The Connection Inc

Building safe, healthy, caring communities and inspiring people to reach their full potential as productive and valued citizens.

Health
10
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
11
Mutual Housing Association of Greater Hartford Inc

The mutual housing association of greater hartford, inc. develops and manages affordable housing in greater hartford while engaging residents in leadership and educational opportunities.

—
12
Hart United Inc

To provide support services to individuals with developmental disabilities throughout connecticut and to maintain a commitment to empower individuals with developmental disabilities and their families to have more choices and opportunities…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness Inc; the most unlike its peers is Amy's Angels Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TLC FOUNDATION INC: $229,880 · Human ServicesTLC FOUNDATION INCJOURNEY HOME INC: $122,024 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOME INCMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $93,000 · OtherMANCHESTER PUBLIC SCHOOLSREBUILDING TOGETHER MANCHESTER: $75,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER MANCHEST…SECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherSECOND CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $40,200 · OtherCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INCLOCAL INITIATIVE SUPPORT CORPORATION: $25,000 · OtherLOCAL INITIATIVE SUPPORT COR…MACC: $24,054 · OtherMACC+5 more: $44,000 · Other+5 moreHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $256,000 · PhilanthropyHARTFORD FOUNDATION F…COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $204,677 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH…MARC INC OF MANCHESTER: $111,036 · EmploymentMARC INC …ORFORD VILLAGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP C/O MALCOLM BARLOW ATTY: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$351,904Other$346,254Philanthropy$256,000Health$204,677Employment$111,036Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING: $256,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTLC FOUNDATION INC: $229,880 over 3y, 68% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC: $204,677 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $122,024 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetMARC INC OF MANCHESTER: $111,036 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetORFORD VILLAGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP C/O MALCOLM BARLOW ATTY: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC: $40,200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION: $8,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING ↗
  • Who funds TLC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC OF MANCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds ORFORD VILLAGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP C/O MALCOLM BARLOW ATTY ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS-ON-WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation f…United Way Inc United…Rockville Bank Commun…Sbm Charitable Founda…Farmington Bank Commu…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Misac Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Misac Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 79%
  • Marc Inc of Manchester: 89% of income from government
  • Community Health Resources Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Orford Village Housing Development Corp C/O Malcolm Barlow Atty: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Misac’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home